Skip to main content
Log in

Weaving narrative nets to capture school science classrooms

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualitative research (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994) provides a variety of methods and approaches for the rich description of classroom events and educational practices, and their meanings for teachers and students. I have chosen to use a quasi-ethnographic methodology employing impressionistic tales of the field (van Maanen, 1988) to explore some of the constraints and successes my colleagues and I encountered while implementing a number of innovative teaching approaches in five middle school classrooms in an Australian city during 1996. I have also explored some of the issues of relationship, reflexivity (Steier, 1995) and mutual respect that arose in the course of the study. The three tales presented here explore issues relating to the nature of science and science education. As important as the specific educational foci of the research, however, is the potential of the chosen methodology—the writing of impressionistic tales—and of the tales themselves to act as occasions for pedagogically-focussed critical reflection. This paper constitutes an invitation to others who conduct research from a pedagogical stance (van Manen, 1990) to explore the possibilities offered by the use of impressionistic tales for researching lived experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice.Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3):53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories—stories of teachers—school stories—stories of schools.Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students.Educational Researcher, 24(5), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R. (1997).The problems and possibilities of paradigm proliferation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL, March 1997.

  • Geelan, D. R. (1994). Learning to communicate: Perspective transformations of a developing science teacher. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. R. (1996). Learning to communicate: Developing as a science teacher.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(1), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism.Science & Education, 6(1–2), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching.Synthese, 80, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & Tann, S. (1992). Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories.Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971).Knowledge and human interests (Translated by J. J. Shapiro). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1978).Legitimation crisis (Translated by T. McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science; A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science.Studies in Science Education, 14, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F. (1995). From universing to conversing: An ecological constructivist approach to learning and multiple description. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),Constructivism in education (pp. 67–84) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. C. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. C. (1997, March).Telling tales that show the brushstrokes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.

  • Taylor, P. C. S., & Campbell-Williams, M. (1993, April).Critical constructivism: Towards a balanced rationality in the high school mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Tobin, K. (1990). Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(4), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maanen, J. (Ed.). (1995).Representation in ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maanen, J. (1988).Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1990).Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1991).The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking—and rejecting—validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.),Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Geelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geelan, D.R. Weaving narrative nets to capture school science classrooms. Research in Science Education 27, 553–563 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461480

Keywords

Navigation