Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 103–109 | Cite as

The dynamics of pain perception in conditions of purposive activity

  • V. P. Degtyarev
  • E. V. Dunina-Barkovskaya


Pain threshold sensitivity determination and recording of somatosensory evoked potentials in response to electrical skin stimulation were used to study the dynamics of pain sensitivity in medical students in mid-semester before blood donor and examination procedures and in the post-procedure period during performance of an editing test. Increases in pain sensitivity thresholds were seen in all subjects during the examination period and on performance of the editing test. Differences in changes in evoked potential amplitudes were found, depending on the individual-typological characteristics of the nervous system and the quality of motivationally determined states. Subjects with different individual-typological characteristics had different subjective pain sensation dynamics in test conditions.


Blood Donation Pain Perception Pain Sensitivity Purposive Activity Dominant Motivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. K. Anokhin, “Functional systems,” in: Key Questions in Functional Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1980), p. 154.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. M. Budylina, The Role of the Dominant Motivation in the Formation of Taste Perception [in Russian], Document deposited in the All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI) No. 68-B90 (1990), p. 398.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. V. Bykova, Yu. V. Polyntsev, E. L. Rogatina, et al., “Individual characteristics of nociceptive sensitivity in rats during formation of negative emotional reactions,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,3, No. 4, 738 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. V. Val'dman, “Pain as an emotional stress reaction and methods for its antinociceptive regulation,” Vestn. Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, No. 9, 11 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. P. Degtyarev, “Pain perception during purposive activity in socially determined states,” in: Purposive Activity in Humans [in Russian], I. M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Institute, Moscow (1991), p. 61.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. P. Degtyarev, “Outcomes of purposive activity in humans as a characteristic of the direction of interemotional interactions,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,19, No. 5, 31 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    É. É. Zvartau, “Comparison of the pain-tolerizing and addictive effects of morphine in various animal species,” in: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Russian Society for the Study of Pain [in Russian], St. Petersburg (1995), p. 28.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. M. Ivanitskii, “Neurophysiological mechanisms of perception and memory: evoked potentials,” in: Handbook of Physiology. Mechanisms of Human Brain Activity, Chapter 1. Human Neurophysiology [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1988), p. 151.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. M. Ivanitskii, V. B. Strelets, and I. A. Korsakov, Information Processes of the Brain and Mental Activity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. F. Lakin, Biometrics [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1990).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pain Syndrome, V. A. Mikhailovich, and Yu. D. Ignatov (eds.), Meditsina, Leningrad (1990), p. 72.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. E. Rubinchik, V. A. Leosko, and L. I. Vasserman “Post-operative pain syndrome: association with initial personality traits and the possibility of predicting the level of severity,” in: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Russian Society for the Study of Pain [in Russian], St. Petersburg (1995), p. 95.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. K. Sangailo, M. P. Vikhreva, N. D. Den'gina, et al., “Some biological and social factors affecting the formation of pain sensations in the human cerebral cortex,” in: Neuronal Mechanisms of Pain, Proceedings of All-Union Symposium, April 23–27 [in Russian], Leningrad (1973), p. 81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. V. Simonov, “The psychophysiology of emotions. Neurophysiological mechanisms of the systems organization of behavior,” in: Fifth Anokhin Readings [in Russian], Moscow (1990), p. 5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Functional Systems of the Body—A Handbook [in Russian], K. V. Sudakov (ed.), Meditsina, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. A. Ukhtomskii, “The dominant as a factor in behavior,” in: Collected Works [in Russian], Leningrad (1927), Vol. 1, p. 293.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. V. Chistyakov, Pain Sensitivity during the Developmen of Stress Responses in Healthy Humans and Its Automated Assessment Using a Computer [in Russian], Author's Abstract of Thesis for Doctorate in Medical Sciences, 2nd Medical Institute, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. N. Shtok, Headache [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1988).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Kh. Yakubova, Premedication in Clinical Urgent Stomatological Treatment Depending on the Emotional-Psychological State of Patients [in Russian], Author's Abstract of Thesis for Doctorate in Medical Sciences, 1 Leningrad Medial Institute, Leningrad (1989).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. L. Baker and I. Kirsch, “Cognitive mediators of pain perception and tolerance,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.,61, 504 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Boivie, “On central pain and central pain mechanisms,” Pain,38, 121 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. J. Eysenck, The Structure of Human Personality, Methuen, London (1970).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Frankenchauezer, U. Lundberg, and V. W. Rauste, “Urinary monoamine metabolites as indices of mental stress in healthy males and females,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.,24, 1521 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Haundart, “Essay of pain,” Encephalogr.,19, 269 (1993).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. L. Levine, “Pharmacology of intravenous sedatives and opioids in critically ill patients,” Crit. Care Clin.,10, 709 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Z. Wisenfelf-Hallin, “The effect of stress and the environment on nociception, pain reaction, and the development of tolerance to opiates in laboratory animals,” Z. Versuchstierk.,27, 63 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Degtyarev
  • E. V. Dunina-Barkovskaya
    • 1
  1. 1.P. K. Anokhin Science Research Institute of Normal PhysiologyRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscow

Personalised recommendations