, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 377–380 | Cite as

Factors affecting microfungal diversity

  • Yoshio Ogawa
  • Seiji Tokumasu
  • Keisuke Tubaki
Short Communication


Species diversity of microfungal communities in decaying oak leaves was analyzed based on the hyphal growth rates of the component species. Dominant species of a low-diversity community had faster hyphal growth rates, while dominant species of a high-diversity community had slower growth rates. These results implies that when the faster growing species became dominant, these species exhausted resources rapidly during the initial stage of fungal colonization. This exclusive utilization of resources made it impossible for other species to invade the substratum and led to a low diversity. Hyphal growth rates played an important role in determining the diversity of microfungal communities.

Key Words

decaying oak leaf hyphal growth rate microfungal community species diversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Apinis, A. E. 1972. Facts and problems. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.48: 93–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, M. 1969. Soil microfungi of dry to mesic coniferhardwood forests in northern Wisconsin. Ecology50: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen, M. 1984. Species diversity and dominance in fungal communities. In: The fungal community, (ed. by Caroll, G. C. and Wicklow, D. T.), pp. 201–232. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, M. and Whittingham, W. F. 1965. The soil microfungi of open bogs and conifer swamps in Wisconsin. Mycologia57: 882–896.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, M., Whittingham, W. F. and Novak, R. O. 1962. The soil microfungi of wet-mesic forests in southern Wisconsin. Mycologia54: 372–388.Google Scholar
  6. Miura, K. and Kudo, M. Y. 1970. An agar medium for aquatic hyphomycetes. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan11: 116–118.Google Scholar
  7. Novak, R. O. and Whittingham, W. F. 1968. Soil and litter microfungi of a maple-elm-ash flood plain community. Mycologia60: 776–787.Google Scholar
  8. Orpurt, P. A. and Curtis, J. T. 1957. Soil microfungi in relation to the prairie continuum in Wisconsin. Ecology38: 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tokumasu, S. 1978. Leaf litter fungi of forests ofPinus densiflora and four introduced pines at Sugadaira, central Japan. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan19: 383–390.Google Scholar
  10. Tokumasu, S. 1980. Observations on the fungal flora on pine leaft litter. In: Biseibutsu no seitai. vol. 7, pp. 129–144. Gakkai Shuppan Center, Tokyo. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
  11. Tresner, H. D., Backus, M. P. and Curtis, J. T. 1954. Soil microfungi in relation to the hardwood forest continuum in southern Wisconsin. Mycologia46: 314–333.Google Scholar
  12. Tubaki, K. 1973. Some aspects of geographical distribution of leaf litter fungi in Japan. Shokubutsu Byogai Kenkyu (Forsch. Gebiet Pflanzenkrankh.), Kyoto8: 61–69.Google Scholar
  13. Wicklow, D. T. and Whittingham, W. F. 1974. Soil microfungal changes among the profiles of disturbed conifer-hardwood forests. Ecology55: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Widden, P. and Parkinson, D. 1973. Fungi from Canadian coniferus forest soils. Can. J. Bot.51: 2275–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Mycological Society of Japan 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshio Ogawa
    • 1
  • Seiji Tokumasu
    • 2
  • Keisuke Tubaki
    • 3
  1. 1.College of PharmacyNihon UniversityFunabashi, ChibaJapan
  2. 2.Sugadaira Montane Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaNaganoJapan
  3. 3.Nodai Research InstituteTokyo University of AgricultureTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations