Research in Science Education

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 69–88 | Cite as

Educating science teachers for the sociocultural diversity of urban schools

  • Kenneth Tobin
  • Gale Seiler
  • Mackenzie W. Smith
Article

Abstract

This interpretive study of the preparation of science teachers for urban high schools explored the extent to which learning to teach was facilitated by the methods courses, cooperating teachers and university supervisors. Because the methods course was minimally effective in addressing the needs of teaching low track students from conditions of poverty the methods instructor, Tobin, decided to be a teacher-researcher with such students. He joined Smith, a student teacher and Seiler, a doctoral student, in an investigation that examined learning to teach in a graduate teacher preparation program. In an endeavour to gain a first hand grasp on the challenges of teaching African American students placed in a low track program of study the three authors of this paper co-taught science in an urban high school. The paper incorporates rich perspectives gained from the teacher-researchers and theoretical frameworks associated with resistance, habitus and learning to teach by co-teaching. The paper advocates co-teaching as an essential component of teacher education programs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agre, P., & Horswill, I. (1997). Lifeworld analysis.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6, 111–145.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  3. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge.Curriculum Inquiry, 10, 55–76.Google Scholar
  4. Anyon, J. (1997).Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Atwater, M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, A. C. (1998a). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton, A. C. (1998b). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty.Educational Policy, 12, 525–541.Google Scholar
  8. Bateson, G. (1980).Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bateson, G., & Bateson, M. C. (1987).Angels fear: Towards an epistemology of the sacred. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1992).Language and symbolic power. Macbridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1997).Méditations pascaliennes [Pascalian meditations]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1982).The ends of man. Margins of philosophy (Trans Alan Bass). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diver-Stamnes, A. (1995).Lives in the balance: Youth, poverty, and education in Watts. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ebert, C. (1997). A new institution: The emerging educational community in an effective professional development school.Action in Teacher Education, 19, 55–62.Google Scholar
  15. Fine, M. (1991).Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on girls in science lessons and applications. In D. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542–556). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Lave, J. (1988).Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lemke, J. L. (1990).Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Levine, M. (1997). Can professional development schools help us achieve what matters most?Action in Teacher Education, 19 63–73.Google Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1992).Texts and dialogues. (Edited and with an introduction by H. J. Silverman, & J. Barry Jr. Translated by M. B. Smith et al.). New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council. (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Newmann, F. (1992).Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  23. Oakes, J. (1985).Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Page, R. N. (1991).Lower track classrooms: A curricular and cultural perspective. New York: Teacher's College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  25. Ricoeur, P. (1992).Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rodriguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's national science education standards.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth, W.-M. (1998a). Science teaching as knowledgeability: A case study of knowing and learning during co-teaching.Science Education, 82, 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth, W.-M. (1998b). Teaching and learning as everyday activity. In B. J. Fraser, & K. Tobin (Eds.),International handbook of science education (pp. 169–181). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., Boyd, N., & Boutonné, S. (1998). Coparticipation as mode for learning to teach science. In S. Gibbons, & J. Anderson (Eds.),Connections '98 (in press). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W.-M., & Boyd, N. (1999). Coteaching, as colearning, in practice.Research in Science Education, 29(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
  31. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (in press). Demystifying epistemology.Cybernetics & Human Knowing.Google Scholar
  32. Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D., & Tobin, K. (1999). Time to teach: Toward a praxeology of teaching. Submitted toCanadian Journal of Education.Google Scholar
  33. Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, N. (in press). Becoming-in-the-classroom: A case study of teacher development through coteaching.Teaching and Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  34. Roth, W-M., & Tobin, K. (1999, submitted). Toward an epistemology of teaching as practice.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  35. Roth, W-M., Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. (1998, manuscript under review).Re/constructing elementary science. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rothstein, S. W. (1993). The nature of pedagogy. In S. W. Rothstein (Ed.),Handbook of schooling in urban American (pp. 287–295). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Seiler, G. (1999).The roles of the cooperating teacher in constraining opportunities to learn to teach. Philadelphia, PA: The University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  38. Sharrock, W., & Button, G. (1991). The social actor: Social action in real time. In G. Button (Ed.),Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 137–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tobin, K. (1998a). Sociocultural perspectives on the teaching of science. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin (Eds.),International handbook of science education (pp. 129–152). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Tobin, K. (1998b). Qualitative perceptions of learning environments on the world wide web.Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tobin, K. (1999a, January).Learning to teach science in urban settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  42. Tobin, K. (1999b, January).Learning to teach by coparticipating within and between diverse communities. Invited keynote address at Science Teacher Education Toward the New Millenium, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, P., Gilmer, P., & Tobin, K. (Eds). (submitted).Transforming undergraduate science teaching: Social constructivist perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Varlea, F. J. (1995). The re-enchantment of the concrete: The biological ingredients for a nouvelle cognitive science. In L. Steele, & R. Brooks (Eds.),The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situtated agents (pp. 11–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  45. Weiner, L. (1993).Preparing teachers for urban schools: Lessons from thirty years of school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  46. Willis, P. (1977).Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yerrick, R. (1998). Reconstructing classroom facts: Transforming lower track science classrooms.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 214–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yerrick, R. (in press). Re-negotiating the discourse of lower track high school students.Research in Science Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Science Education Research Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Tobin
    • 1
  • Gale Seiler
    • 1
  • Mackenzie W. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations