Skip to main content
Log in

Coteaching, as colearning, is praxis

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we report on our learning as we engaged in a four-month experience of coteaching a water unit in a Grade 7 classroom. Working at each other's elbows, in praxis, provided many opportunities to learn together: teaching and about teaching. We use two examples, learning to ask productive questions and struggling to enact an orderly curriculum to show how coteaching affords colearning, and how the lack of coteaching leads to struggling. Our work also suggests that coteaching allows for a mode of learning that is not captured by Schön's notions of reflection-in-practice and reflection-on-practice. We conclude that coteaching, as colearning, is praxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P. Bourdieu, & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.),An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997).Méditations pascaliennes [Pascalian meditations]. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1995).The engine of reasoning, the seat of the soul: A philosophical journey into the brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1985).Primary science: Taking the plunge. London: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977).Sein und zeit [Being and time]. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R., & Clift, R. T. (1984). Teacher education and the social context of the workplace.Childhood Education, 61, 115–119, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. (1987).Modes of teaching and learning: Questions raised by the training of traditional birth attendants. (IRL Report No. IRL87-0004). Palo Alto, CA.

  • Jordan, B. (1989). Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives.Social Science in Medicine, 28, 925–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K., & Lynch, M. (1993). The mainstreaming of a molecular biological tool A case study of a new technique. In G. Button (Ed.),Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 162–178). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988).Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice.Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1990).Soi-même comme un autre [Onself as another]. Paris: Seuil. (English translation published in 1992 by University of Chicago Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991).From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1994). Student views of collaborative concept mapping: An emancipatory research project.Science Education, 78, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1998a).Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1998b). Science teaching as knowledgeability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching.Science Education, 82, 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1998c). Teaching and learning as everyday activity. In B. Fraser, & K. Tobin (Eds.),International handbook of science education (pp. 169–181). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., Boyd, N., & Boutonné, S. (in press).Coparticipation as mode for learning to teach science. In W. Liedke (Ed.),Connections '98. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.

  • Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Bowen, G. M. (1998, October).From thing to sign and “natural object”: Toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Halifax, NS.

  • Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, N. (in press). Becoming-in-the-classroom: A case study of teacher development through coteaching.Teaching and Teacher Education.

  • Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonné, S. (in press). Differential participation during science converstations: The interaction of display artifacts, social configuration, and physical arrangements.The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

  • Schön, D. A. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue and narrative identity in teaching.Curriculum Inquiry, 24, 135–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1995). On the epistemology of reflective practice.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolff-Michael Roth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, WM., Boyd, N. Coteaching, as colearning, is praxis. Research in Science Education 29, 51–67 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461180

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461180

Keywords

Navigation