Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 39–60 | Cite as

Postmodern criminology in relation to radical and conflict criminology

  • Bruce A. Arrigo
  • Thomas J. Bernard
Essays

Abstract

The literature on postmodern criminology suggests that there is some relationship between it and radical criminology. This relationship apparently is based in part on the ract that both are further related to conflict theory. However, conceptual analyses on these types of theories have not fully explicated whatever similarities and differences exist among them. This essay identifies six core theoretical assertions in conflict criminology and compares them to parallel assertions in radical and postmodern criminology. Such comparison is followed by a discussion on the relevance of conflict and radical theory as conceptual backdrops from which to comprehend postmodern inquiry.

Keywords

Criminal Behavior Economic Power Critical Criminology Conflict Theory Patrol Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrigo, B.A. 1992. ‘Deconstructing Jurisprudence: An Experiential Feminist Critique,’The Journal of Human Justice, 4 (1): 13–30Google Scholar
  2. — 1993a.Madness, Langguage, and the Law. Albany, NY: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1993b. ‘An Experientially-Informed feminist Jurisprudence: Rape and the Move Toward Praxis,”Humanity and Society, 17 (1): 28–47Google Scholar
  4. — 1994. ‘Legal Discourse and the Disordered Criminal Defendant.’Legal Studies Forum, 18 (1): 93–112Google Scholar
  5. — 1995. ‘The Peripheral Core of Law and Criminology: On Postmodem Social Theory and Conceptual Integration,’Justice Quarterly, 12 (3): 447–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. — 1996a.The Contours of Psychiatric Justice: A Postmodern Critique of Mental Illness, Criminal Insanity and the Law. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1996b. ‘The Behavior of Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking Knowledge Construction and the Guilty But Mentally Ill Verdict.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23 (4): 572–592Google Scholar
  8. — 1996c. ‘Desite in the Psychiatric Courtroom: On Lacan and the Dialectics of Linguistic Oppression.’Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 16: 159–187Google Scholar
  9. — 1997a. ‘Media Madness as Crime in the Making: On O.J. Simpson, Consumerism, and Hyperreality,’ in Gregg Barak, ed.,Representing OJ: Criminal Justice and Mass Culture, 123–136. New York: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1997b. ‘Marxist Criminology and Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Outline for a General Constitutive Theory of Crime,’ in Jeffrey I. Ross, ed.,Cutting the Edge: Current Perspectives in Critical and Radical Criminology. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  11. Arrigo, B.A., and T.R. Young. 1998 (fc). ‘Theories of Crime and Crimes of Theorists: On the Topological Construction of Criminological Reality.’Theory and Psychology Google Scholar
  12. Baudrillard, J. 1981.For A Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St Louis: Telos Press-1983Simulacra and Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e)Google Scholar
  13. Bernard, T.J. 1981. ‘The Distinction Between Conflict and Radical Criminology.’The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72 (1): 362–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — 1983.The Consensus-Conflict Debate: Form and Content in Social Theories. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Blau, J., and P. Blau. 1982. ‘The Cost of Inequality: Metropolitan Structure and Violent Crime.”American Sociological Review, 47 (4): 114–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bohm, R.M. 1982. ‘Radical Criminology: An Explication.’Criminology, 19 (4): 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bonger, W. 1916.Criminality and Economic Conditions. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
  18. Borgmann, A. 1992.Crossing the Postmodern Divide. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. 1987. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.’The Hastings Law Journal, 38 (2): 814–853Google Scholar
  20. Bracher, M. 1993.Lacan, Discourse, and Social Change: A Psychoanalytic Cultural Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Chambliss, W. 1988.On the Take: From Petty Crooks to Presidents. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Cornell, D. 1991.Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction and the Law, New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  23. — 1993.Transformations: Recollective Imagination and Sexual Difference. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Coster, L. A. 1967.Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Currie, D.H., and B.D. MacLean. 1992.Re Thinking the Administration of Justice. Halifax: FernwoodGoogle Scholar
  26. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1987.A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Derrida, J. 1973.Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. — 1978.Writing and Difference. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  29. Einstadter, W., and Stuart Henry. 1995.Criminological Theory: An Analysis of its Underlying Assumptions, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt BraceGoogle Scholar
  30. Engels, F. 1845.The Condition of the Working Class in England. New York: International PublishersGoogle Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. 1970.The Order of Things. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
  32. — 1972.The Archeology of Knowledge. A. Sheridan, trans. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
  33. Frank, N., and M.J. Lynch. 1992.Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence. Albany, New York: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  34. Freire, P. 1972.Pedagogy of the Oppressed New York: Herder and HerderGoogle Scholar
  35. — 1973.Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedrichs, D.O. 1995.White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society. Bellmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
  37. Giddens, A. 1984.The Constitution of Society: Outline for a Theory of Structuration. Oxford: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Goodrich, P. 1984. ‘Law and Language: An Historical and Critical Introduction.’Journal of Law and Society, 11 (2): 173–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Groves, W.B., and N. Frank. 1987. ‘Punishment, Privilege and the Sociology of Structure Choice,’ in W. Byron Groves and Graeme R. Newman, eds.Punishment and Privilege, 181–214. New York: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  40. Handler, J. 1992. ‘Postmodemism, Protest, and the New Social Movement,’Law and Society Review, 26 (4): 697–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henry, S., and D. Milovanovic. 1991. ‘Constitutive Crimuinology: Maturation of Critical Theory.’Criminology, 29 (2): 293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. — 1993. ‘Back to Basics: A Postmodern Redefinition of Crime.’The Critical Criminologist, 5 (2/3): 1–2, 6, 12Google Scholar
  43. — 1996.Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  44. Jackson, B. 1988.Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence. Liverpool.: Deborah CharlesGoogle Scholar
  45. Kristeva, J. 1980.Desire in Language. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  46. — 1984.Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Keller, R. L. 1976. ‘A Sociological Analysis of the Conflict and Critical Criminologies.’ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of MontanaGoogle Scholar
  48. Lacan, J. 1977.Ecrits: A Selection, A Sheridan, trans. New York: SheridanGoogle Scholar
  49. — 1981.The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
  50. — 1991.L’Envers de la Psychanalyse. Paris: Editions du SeuilGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, S.L. 1990.Jacques Lacan. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Lemaire, A. 1977.Jacques Lacan, D. Macey, trans. new York: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  53. Lynch, M.J. 1987. ‘Quantitative Analysis and Marxist Criminology.Social Justice, 15 (1): 173–185Google Scholar
  54. — 1988. ‘Surplus Value, Crime and Punishment: A Preliminary Examination,’Contemporary Crises, 12 (3): 329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lynch, M., and W.B. Groves. 1989.A Primer in Radical Criminology. Albay, New York: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  56. MacLean, B.D., and H. Pepinsky. 1993.We Who Would Take No Prisoners: Selections From the Fifth International Conference on Penal Abolition. Vancouver: Collective PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Manning, P.K. 1988.Symbolic Communication: Signifying Calls and the Police Response. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Marx, K. 1868Capital, Vols. I–III. New York: International PublishersGoogle Scholar
  59. — 1964.The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International PublishersGoogle Scholar
  60. — 1969.Theories of Surplus Value, Vols. I–III. London: Lawrence and WishartGoogle Scholar
  61. — 1975.The Holy Family. London: Lawrence and WishartGoogle Scholar
  62. Marcuse, H. 1970.One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Melville, S. 1987. ‘Psychoanalysis and the Place of Jouissance.’Critical Inquiry, 13: 349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Michalowski, R.J. 1985.Order, Law, and Crime: An Introduction to Criminology New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  65. Miller, W. B. 1958. ‘Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency.Journal of Social Issues 14 (3): 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Milovanovic, D. 1986. ‘Jurideo-linguistic Communicative Markets: Towards a Semiotic Analysis.’Contemporary Crises, 10: 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. — 1988. Jailhouse Lawyers and Jailhouse Lawyering.International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 16 (1): 455–475Google Scholar
  68. — 1992.Postmodern Law and Disorder: Psychoanalytic Semiotics, Chaos and Juridic Exegeses. Liverpool: Deborah CharlesGoogle Scholar
  69. — 1994.A Primer in the Sociology of Law. Albany, New York: Harrow and HestonGoogle Scholar
  70. Moi, T. 1985.Sexual/Textual Politics: London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
  71. Pepinsky, H., and R. Quinney. 1991Criminology as Peacemaking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Quinney, R., and J. Wildeman. 1991.The Problem of Crime: A Peace and Justice Perspective, 3rd. ed. London: MayfieldGoogle Scholar
  73. Ragland-Sullivan, E. 1988.Jacques Lacan and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  74. Reiman, J. 1995.The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice. 3rd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
  75. Rossi-Landi, F. 1977.Linguistics and Economics. Netherlands: MoutonGoogle Scholar
  76. — 1983.Language as Work and Trade: A Semiotic Homology for Linguistics and Economics. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and GarveyGoogle Scholar
  77. Salecl, R. 1993. ‘Crime as a Mode of Subjectivization: Lacan and the Law,’Law and Critique, 4 (1): 2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, M.D., and D.O. Friedrichs, 1994. ‘Postmodern Thought and Criminological Discontent: New Metaphors for Understanding Violence,’Criminology, 32: 221–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwartz, M.D., and D. Milovanovic. 1996.Race, Gender, and Class in Criminology. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
  80. Silveman, K. 1983.The Subject of Semiotics. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  81. Taylor, I., P. Walton, and J. Young. 1973.The New Criminology: For A Social Theory of Deviance. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
  82. Unger, R. 1987.False Necessity. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  83. Vold, G. B., and T. J. Bermard. 1986.Theorefical Criminology, 3rd. ed. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  84. Young, I. 1990.Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Division on Critical Criminology 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce A. Arrigo
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Bernard
    • 2
  1. 1.California School of Professional PsychologyUSA
  2. 2.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations