Skip to main content
Log in

Legal ethnography: Exploring the gendered nature of legal method

  • Essays
  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beginning with the idea of law as discourse, this essay examines the ways in which legal method is gendered. Texts, such as affidavits and court forms, and local ‘mundane’ practices are part of the production and affirmation of the law as a producer of truth. A possible methodology for exploring legal method, ‘legal ethnography,’ is introduced as a means by which wemight explicate how legal method works to support and reify legal discourse, in the process silencing the voices of women. The essay also explores how legal method comes to be accepted as a ‘tool of the trade’ by lawyers, who then use it to translate the primary narrative of the client into a cause of action that is comprehensible to lawyers, judges, and other actors in the legal system. Finally, the limitations of the proposed methodology are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, Katharine T. 1990. ‘Feminist Legal Methods.’Harvard Law Review, 103: 829–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Susan. 1991. ‘Some Postmodernist Challenges to Feminist Analyses of Law, Family and State: Ideology and Discourse in Child Custody Law.’Canadian Journal of Family Law, 10(1): 79–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Susan B., and Elizabeth A. Sheehey. 1986. ‘Feminist Perspectives on Law: Canadian Theory and Practice.’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 2 (1): 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, Annie. 1992. ‘Feminism, Foucault, and Law as Power/Knowledge.’Alberta Law Review, 30 (3): 829–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Maureen. 1979. ‘The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception.’International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7: 331–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Comell, Drucilla. 1991.Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction, and the Law. New York and London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Danet, Brenda, Kenneth B. Hoffman, and Nicole C. Kermish. 1980. ‘Obstacles to the Study of Lawyer-Client Interaction: The Biography of a Failure.’Law and Society Review 14 (4): 905–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, T. Brettel. 1987. ‘Sexual Assault Law and Past Conduct of the Primary Witness: The Construction of Relevance.’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 2 (2): 310–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Chris. 1993. ‘The Everyday World is Problematic: Ideology and Recursion in Dorothy Smith's Micro-sociology.’Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18 (1): 43–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Chris. 1992. ‘Institutional Ethnography as Problematic: Recursion and Ideolofy in Dorothy Smith's Macro Sociology.’ Unpublished manuscript

  • Eichler, Margrit. 1990. ‘The Relationship Between Sexist, Nonsexist, Woman-Centred, and Feminist Research,’ in Greta Hofmann Nemiroff, ed.,Women and Men: Interdisciplinary Reading on Gender, 31–61. Montreal: Fitzhenry and Whiteside

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984.The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, Lucinda M. 1989. ‘Breaking women's Silence in Law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning.’Notre Dame Law Review, 64 (5): 886–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1990. ‘Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critiques,’ in Linda J. Nicholson, ed.,Feminism/Postmodernism, 83–106. New York and London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives. New York: Comell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Angela. 1990. ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.’Stanford Law Review, 42 (Feb.): 581–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosticka, Carl J. 1979. ‘We Don't Care About What Happened, We Only Care About What is Going to Happen: Lawyer-Client Negotiations of Reality.’ Social Problems, 26 (5): 599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, Kathleen A. 1989. ‘Celebration and Struggle: Feminism and Law,’ in Angela Miles and Geraldine Finn, eds.,Feminism: From Pressure to Politics, 99–122. Montreal: Black Rose

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. ‘On Silences, Screams and Scholarship: An Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory.’ in Richard F. Devlin, ed.,Feminist Legal Theory, 47–64. Toronto: Edmond Publications Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemer, Gerda. 1993.The Creation of Feminist Consciousness: From the Middle Ages to Eighteen Seventy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Gayle. 1993. ‘The Contribution of Social Science Method to Uncovering Sexism in Law,’ in Joan Brockman and Dorothy Chunn, eds., Investigating Gender Bias: Law, Courts and the Legal Profession, 63–75. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. ‘Femmism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward a Feminist Jurisprudence,’ in Sandra Harding, ed.,Feminism and Methodology, 135–156. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1989.Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. ‘From Practice to Theory, or What is a White Woman Anyway?’Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 4 (1): 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Douglas W., and John F. Manzo. 1993. ‘On the Sociology of Justice: Theoretical Notes From an Actual Jury Deliberation.’Sociological Theory, 11 (2): 171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendy, John P. 1992. ‘Ideological Practices and the Management of Emotions: The Case of “Wife Abusers”.’Critical Sociology, 19 (2): 61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1992. ‘Mainstreaming Feminist Legal Theory.’Pacific Law Review, 23 (4): 1493–1542

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, Mary Jane. 1986. ‘Feminism and Legal Method: The Difference It Makes.’Australian Journal of Law and Society, 3: 30–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, Richard. 1984. ‘The Primary Caretaker Parent Rule: Child Custody and the Dynamics of Greed.’Yale Law and Policy Review, 3 (1): 168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Roxana. 1988.The Politics of Community Service: Immigrant Women, Class and State. Toronto: Garamond Press

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. ‘State Funding to a Community Employment Centre: Implications for Working with Immigrant Women,’ in Roxana Ng, Gillian Walker and Jacob Miller, eds.,Community, Organization and the State, 165–183. Toronto: Garamond Press

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Mary, and Sheila McIntyre. 1987. ‘Patriarchal Hegemony and Legal Education.’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 2 (1): 69–95

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan, Katherine. 1989. ‘Engendering Justice: Women's Perspectives and the Rule of Law.’ University of Toronto Law Journal, 39: 127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, Elizabeth. 1992. ‘Generalizing Gender: Reason and Essence in the Legal Thought of Catharine MacKinnon,’ in V. Spike Peterson, ed.,Gendered State: Feminist (Re) visions of International Relations, 127–143. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Razack, Sherene. 1991.Canadian Feminism and the Law: The Women's Legal Education and Action Fund and the Pursuit of Equality. Toronto: Second Story Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Marguerite. 1989. ‘A Feminist Analysis of the Criminal Trial Process.’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 3 (2): 552

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, Austin, and William L.F. Felstiner. 1986. ‘Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office.’Law and Society Review, 10 (1): 93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, Anne. 1986. ‘The Emergence if Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay.’The Yale Law Journal, 95 (7): 1373–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan. 1990. ‘Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststucturalist Theory for Feminism,’ in Marianne Hirsch and Evelyn Fox Keller, eds.,Conflicts in Feminism, 134–148. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, Faith A. 1985. ‘The Bifurcated Woman: Problems of Women Lawyers in the Courtroom.’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 1 (1): 219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Carol. 1989.Feminism and the Power of Law, London and New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. ‘Law's Power, the Sexed Body, and Feminist Discourse.’ Journal of Law and Society, 17 (2): 194–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy E. 1987a.The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987b. ‘Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology,’ in Sandra Harding, ed.,Feminism and Methodology, 84–96. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1988. ‘Institutional Ethnography: A Feminist Method,’ in Arlene Tigar McLaren, ed.,Gender and Society: Creating a Canadian Women's Sociology, 62–79. Toronto: Copp, Clark, Pitman

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990a.The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990b.Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, David. 1965. ‘Normal Crimes.’Social Problems, 12 (3): 255–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomton, Margaret. 1986. ‘Feminist Jurisprudence: Illusion or Reality?’Australian Journal of Law and Society, 3: 5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Jill McCalla. 1989. ‘Memoirs of an Ontological Exile: The Methodological Rebellions of Feminist Research,’ in Angela Miles and Geraldine Finn, eds.,Feminism: From Pressure to Politics, 37–56. Montreal: Black Rose Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Gillian A. 1990.Family Violence and the Women's Movement: The Conceptual Politics of Struggle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Robin. 1988. ‘Jurisprudence and Gender,’The University of Chicago Review, 55 (1): 1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Bertha. 1993. ‘Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?’, in T. Brettel Dawson, ed.,Women, Law and Social Change: Core Readings and Current Issues, 157–163. Ottawa: Captus

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, Anne. 1990.Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the Criminal Justice System. London and New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Don H. 1974. ‘Facts as a Practical Accomplishment,’ in Roy Tumer, ed.,Ethnomethodology, 128–143. Markham, Ont: Penguin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Don, and Candice West. 1975. ‘Sex Role, Interruptions, and Silence in Conversation,’ in B. Thome and N. Henley, eds.,Language and Sex, 105–129. Rowley, Ma: Newbury

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beaman-Hall, L. Legal ethnography: Exploring the gendered nature of legal method. Critical Criminology 7, 53–74 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461094

Keywords

Navigation