Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 423–426 | Cite as

Experimentally induced actin depolymerization disrupts the adaptive state of neurons

  • L. L. Pavlik
  • N. R. Tiras
  • D. A. Moshkov


Movement Activity Test Stimulation Isotonic Saline Vestibular Stimulation Actin Fiber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. A. Moshkoy,Adaptation and Ultrastructure of the Neuron [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Moshkov and L. N. Masyuk, “Accommodational changes in synaptic contacts during long-term adaptation of neurons to adequate stimulation,”Tsitologiya,20, No. 4, 360–367 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. A. Moshkov, I. Ya. Podol'skii, L. N. Muzafarova, et al. “Quantitative characterization off motor activity in fish as a possible indicator of the state of Mauthner neurons,”Zh. fvol. Biokhim.,18, No. 2, 155–160 (1982).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. A. Moshkov, G. V. Yanyushina, and V. V. Potemkin, “Neurochemical studies of goldfish brain slices containing Mauthner neurons during adaptation to repeated stimulation,”Tsitologiya,32, No. 1, 34–40 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. L. Pavlik, N. R. Tiras, and D. A. Moshkov, “Detection of actin and the organizational features of Mauthner neurons in the goldfish,”Tsitologiya,32, No. 4, 34–40 (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. L. Pavlik, N. R. Tiras, and D. A. Moshkov, “Actin in Mauthner neurons of the goldfish after exposure to phalloidin and adaptation to long-term stimulation,”Tsitologiya,39, No. 12, 1109–1115 (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. R. Tiras and D. A. Moshkov, “Cytoskeletal differences in inhibitory and excitatory synapses,”Tsitologiya,29, No. 2, 156–160 (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Nakajima, “Fine structure of the synaptic endings on the Mauthner cell of the goldfish,”J. Comp. Neurol.,156, 375–402 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. L. Pavlik and D. A. Moshkov, “Actin in synaptic cytoskeleton during long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices,”Acta Histochem.,41, 257–264 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. E. Pered, Th. Bell, and D. S. Faber, “Retrograde synaptic communication via gap junctions coupling auditory afferents to the Mauthner cell,”J. Neurosci.,15, 5943–5955 (1995).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. R. Tiras, L. L. Pavlik, and D. A. Moshkov, “Alterations in the cytoskeleton of the goldfish Mauthner cells under various pharmacological treatments,”Acta Histochem.,41, 249–256 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    X.-D. Yang and D. S. Faber, “Initial synaptic efficacy influences induction and expression of long-term changes in transmission,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,88, 4299–4303 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    X-D. Yang and D. S. Faber, “Long-term potentiation of electrotonic coupling at mixed synapses,”Nature,348, 542–545 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. L. Pavlik
  • N. R. Tiras
  • D. A. Moshkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuron Ultrastructure Laboratory MoshkovInstitute of Theoretical, and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of SciencesPushchino

Personalised recommendations