# Analysis of potassium conductance in squid giant axons

- 30 Downloads
- 3 Citations

## Abstract

Assuming a model of facilitated ionic transport across axonal membranes proposed by McIlroy (1975) and extended by McIlroy and Hahn (1978), it is shown that if the selectivity coefficient, π_{K}, of the potassium conducting system ≃59 the permeability*P* _{Ks}, of the periaxonal barrier of the squid giant axon for K^{+} ions≃(1.2±0.44)×10^{−4} cm sec^{−1} and the thickness of the periaxonal space ≃477±168 Å. Using a value (10^{−4} cm sec^{−1}) of*P* _{Ks} in the foregoing range the experimental curves for the steady state membrane ionic conductance versus measured membrane potential difference (p.d.), ϕ, of Gilbert and Ehrenstein (1969) are corrected for the effect of accumulation of K^{+} in the periaxonal space. This correction is most marked for the axon immersed in a natural ionic environment, whose conductance curve is shifted ≃70mV along the voltage axis in the hyperpolarization direction.

By assuming that the physico-chemical connection between a depolarization of the axonal membrane and the consequent membrane conductance changes is a Wien dissociative effect of the membrane's electric field on a weak electrolyte situated in the axolemma, the position of the peaks of the corrected conductance versus ϕ curves can be identified with zero membrane electric field and hence with zero p.d.*across* the axolemma. A set of values for the double-layer p.d.s at the axonal membrane interfaces with the external electrolytes in the vicinity of the K^{+} conducting pores can therefore be deduced for the various external electrolytes employed by Gilbert and Ehrenstein. A model of these double-layer p.d.s in which the membrane interfaces are assumed to possess fixed monovalent negatively charged sites, at least in the neighbourhood of the K^{+} conducting pores, is constructed. It is shown that, using the previously deduced values for the doublelayer p.d.s, such a model has a consistent, physically realistic solution for the distance between the fixed charged sites and for the dissociation constants of these sites in their interaction with the ions of the extramembrane electrolytes.

### Keywords

Giant Axon Potassium Conductance Conductance Curve Membrane Interface Axonal Membrane## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### Literature

- Adam, G. 1973. “The Effect of Potassium Diffusion through the Schwann Cell Layer on Potassium Conductance of the Squid Giant Axon.”
*J. Membrane Biol.*,**13**, 353–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Adelman, W. A. Jr., Y. Palti and J. P. Senft. 1973. “Potassium Ion Accumulation in a Periaxonal Space and Its Effect on the Measurement of Membrane Potassium Ion Conductance”.
*J. Membrane Biol.*,**13**, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bezanilla F. and C. M. Armstrong. 1972. “Negative Conductance Caused by Entry of Sodium and Cesium Ions into the Potassium Channels of Squid Axons”.
*J. Gen. Physiol.*,**60**, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cole, K. S. 1969. “Zeta Potential and Discrete Versus Uniform Surface Charges”.
*Biophys. J.*,**9**, 465–469.Google Scholar - Ehrenstein, G. 1977. Private communication.Google Scholar
- Frankenhaeuser, B. and A. L. Hodgkin. 1956. “The After-Effects of Impulses in the Giant Nerve Fibres of
*Loligo*”.*J. Physiol.*,**131**, 341–376.Google Scholar - — and —. 1957. “The Action of Calcium on the Electrical Properties of Squid Axons”.
*J. Physiol.*,**137**, 218–244.Google Scholar - Gilbert, D. L. and G. Ehrenstein. 1969. “Effect of Divalent Cations on Potassium Conductance of Squid Axons: Determination of Surface Charge”.
*Biophys. J.***9**, 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Grahame, D. C. 1947. “The Electrical Double Layer and the Theory of Electrocapillarity”.
*Chem. Rev.*,**41**, 441–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hodgkin, A. L. 1964.
*The Conduction of the Nervous Impulse*, p. 23. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar - — and A. F. Huxley. 1952a. “Currents Carried by Sodium and Potassium Ions Through the Membrane of the Giant Axon of
*Loligo*”.*J. Physiol.*,**116**, 449–472.Google Scholar - — and —. 1952b. “The Components of Membrane Conductance in the Giant Axon of
*Loligo*”.*J. Physol.*,**116**, 473–496.Google Scholar - — and —. 1952c. “The Dual Effect of Membrane Potential on Sodium Conductance in the Giant Axon of
*Loligo*”.*J. Physiol.*,**116**, 497–506.Google Scholar - — and —. 1952d. “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Applications to Conductance and Excitation in Nerve”.
*J. Physiol.*,**117**, 500–554.Google Scholar - Kay, G. W. C. and T. H. Laby, 1975.
*Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants and Some Mathematical Functions*, 14th ed., p. 223. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar - Mason, D. P. and D. K. McIlroy. 1978. “A Perturbation Solution to the Problem of Wien Dissociation in Weak Electrolytes”.
*Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A.***359**, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - McIlroy, D. K. 1970a. “A Mathematical Model of the Nerve Impulse at the Molecular Level”.
*Math. Biosci.*,**7**, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - — 1970b. “Analysis of the Enzyme Model of the Nerve”.
*Math. Biosci.*,**8**, 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - — 1970c. “Deductions from the Enzyme Model of the Nerve”.
*Math. Biosci.*,**9**, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - — 1975. “Electric Field Distributions in Neuronal Membranes”.
*Math. Biosci.***26**, 191–206.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - — and B. D. Hahn. 1978. “Electric Field Distribution, Ionic Selectivity and Permeability in Nerve”.
*Bull. Math. Biol.*,**40**, 637–649.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Onsager, L. 1934. “Deviations from Ohm's Law in Weak Electrolyte”.
*J. Chem. Phys.*,**2**, 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar