, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 383–398 | Cite as

Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme

  • M. Bordons
  • M. A. Zulueta
  • F. Romero
  • S. Barrigón


A Multidisciplinary Research Programme (MRP) is being developed since 1989 in the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain, to support cross-disciplinary research projects. This paper analyses the incidence of interdisciplinarity in the UCM scientific publications over the period 1990–96 and tries to determine the success of the Programme at fostering cross-disciplinary research. Interdisciplinary in the UCM is measured through the collaboration of authors from different institutional addresses within the UCM, both in scientific publications and in research projects. Publications jointly signed by the different teams that collaborate in the projects were identified as an indicator of the success of the Programme in integrating disciplines. Interdisciplinary collaboration within the UCM showed an upward trend over time. Publications of MRP groups showed a higher interdisciplinary collaboration rate than the rest of the UCM (17% vs. 9%). Dramatic repercussions of the Programme were not expected due to its limited magnitude, but it worked as a catalyst, enhancing interdisciplinary relations within the UCM. The interest of such a programme is supported by its effects, both direct effects on granted teams and indirect on the whole UCM community.


Scientific Output Extended Productivity Scientific Area Interdisciplinary Collaboration Leader Center 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Dogan, The hybridization of social science knowledge,Library Trends, 45 (2) (1996) 296–314.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. T. Klein, Interdisciplinary needs: the current context,Library Trends, 45 (2) (1996) 134–154.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Garwin, US universities create bridges between physics and biology,Nature, 397 (1999) 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Rip, J. P. Courtial, Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. J. W. Tijssen, A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: coclassification analysis of energy research,Research Policy, 21 (1) (1992) 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. L. Porter, D. E. Chubin, An indicator of cross-disciplinary research,Scientometrics, 8 (3–4) (1985) 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. T. Tomov, H. G. Mutafov, Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science,Scientometrics, 37 (2) (1996) 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Qiu, A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration,Research Evaluation, 2 (3) (1992) 169–175.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Qin, F. W. Lancaster, B. Allen, Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (10) (1997) 893–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Gómez, M. T. Fernández, M. Bordons, A. Cabrero, M. A. Zulueta, F. Morillo,La producción científica de la CAM a través del Science Citation Index y del Social Citation Index en el período 1990–93. Estudio bibliométrico, CINDOC, Madrid, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Gómez, M. T. Fernández, M. Bordons, A. Cabrero, M. A. Zulueta, F. Morillo,La producción científica de la CAM a través del Science Citation Index y del Social Citation Index en el período 1994–96. Estudio bibliométrico, CINDOC, Madrid, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Gómez, M. T. Fernández, A. Méndez, Collaboration patterns of Spanish scientific publications in different research areas and disciplines. In:Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Learned Information Inc., Medford, 1995, p. 187–196.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (1988–1995)Una aproximación al análisis de un Programa de I+D J. R. Ricoy, M. F. Guasch, L. E. Clavería (Eds), Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bordons
    • 1
  • M. A. Zulueta
    • 2
  • F. Romero
    • 1
  • S. Barrigón
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Información y Documentación Científica (CINDOC)Madrid(Spain)
  2. 2.Facultad de DocumentaciónUniversidad de AlcaláMadrid(Spain)
  3. 3.Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadrid(Spain)

Personalised recommendations