Advertisement

Transplant International

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 102–107 | Cite as

Monitoring of renal allografts by duplex ultrasound

  • K. -P. Grigat
  • G. Leimenstoll
  • R. Engemann
  • W. Niedermayer
Original Articles

Abstract

Deterioration of renal transplant function due to rejection is accompanied by changes in renal blood flow that can be measured by duplex ultrasound (DU). In the present study, 60 transplanted patients were followed up. A total of 233 duplex examinations, 68 percutaneous biopsies, 44 renal scintigraphies, and 6 transplant nephrectomies were performed on these patients. Diagnoses were made on the basis of clinical and histological data. Renal perfusion was calculated by means of DU. In addition, the arterial Doppler signals were quantified using a pulsatility index (PI). Mean perfusion of normal renal allografts was 0.47 l/min. A decrease in blood flow could be found in acute vascular and chronic rejection but not in acute cellular rejection. A lack of renal perfusion due to acute vascular rejection was observed in four patients. Mean PI, used as a parameter of DU, rose significantly in all forms of rejection, which could be diagnosed with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 86%. Cyclosporin overdosage did not alter the Doppler flow shape.

Key words

Duplex ultrasound, in renal transplantation Duplex ultrasound, in rejection of kidneys Duplex ultrasound, in cyclosporin toxicity Renal blood flow, with duplex ultrasound 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bundy AL, Fleischer AC, Thieme GA, Winfield AC, James AE (1985) Urologic sonography. A review. Appl Radiol 14: 136–140Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czembirek H (1987) Zum Wert der abdominellen gepulsten Duplexsonographie. Radiologe 27: 98–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Multicentre Trial Group (1986) Ciclosporin in cadaveric renal transplantation: One year follow up of a multicentre trial. Lancet II: 986–989Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foegh ML, Winchester JF, Zmudka M, Helfrich GB, Cooley C, Ramovek PW, Schreiner GE (1981) Urine iTXB2 in renal allograft rejection. Lancet II: 431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollenberg NK, Retik AB, Rosen SM, Murray JE, Merill JP (1968) The role of vasoconstriction on the ischemia of renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 6: 59–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis DH, Bergenz SE, Brunius U, Ekman H (1968) Blood flow in kidney transplants. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2: 36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linkowski GD, Warvariv V, Filly RA, Vincenti F (1987) Sonography in the diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection and cyclosporin nephrotoxicity. AJR 148:292–295Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murray BM, Paller MS (1986) Beneficial effects of renal denervation and prazosin on GFR and renal blood flow after cyclosporin in rats. Clin Nephrol 25 [Suppl 1]: 37–39Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porter KA (1974) Renal transplantation. In: Heptinstall RH (ed) Pathology of the kidney. Little, Brown and Co, Boston, pp 977–1041Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rigsby CM, Taylor KJW, Weltin G, Burns PN, Bia M, Princenthal RA, Kashgarian M, Flye MW (1986) Renal allografts in acute rejection: Evaluation using duplex sonography. Radiology 158: 375–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rigsby CM, Burns PN, Weltin GG, Chen B, Bia M, Taylor KJW (1987) Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 162: 39–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor KJW, Burns PN (1985) Duplex Doppler scanning in the pelvis and abdomen. Ultrasound Med Biol 11: 643–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor KJW, Burns PN, Woodcock JP, Wells PNT (1985) Blood flow in deep abdominal and pelvic vessels: ultrasonic pulsed Doppler analysis. Radiology 154: 478–493Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Mygind T, Holm HH, Munck O, Damgaard-Pedersen K (1985) The transplanted kidney. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 26: 353–367Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams PL, Williams MA, Konntz SL, Dempster WJ (1964) Ultrastructural and haemodynamic studies in canine renal transplants. J Anat 98: 545–569PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. -P. Grigat
    • 1
  • G. Leimenstoll
    • 2
  • R. Engemann
    • 3
  • W. Niedermayer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of General Internal MedicineUniversity of KielKielFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Department of NephrologyUniversity of KielKielFederal Republic of Germany
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of KielKielFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations