Scientometrics

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 541–554 | Cite as

How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model

  • J. S. Katz
  • Diana Hicks
Article

Abstract

Interest in collaboration is increasing in policy circles. There are numerous international and national programs to encourage collaboration, for example, between university and industry researchers. However, little is know about the way in which collaboration changes the impact of a research publication. This paper explores how the impact (average citations per paper) varies with different types of collaboration. A calibrated bibliometric model is derived that demonstrates that collaborating with an author from the home institution or another domestic institution increases the average impact by approximately 0.75 citations while collaborating with an author from a foreign institution increases the impact by about 1.6 citations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hicks, D., Katz, J. S. (1997),The Changing Shape of British Industrial Research, STEEP special report No 6, University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Hicks, D., Katz, J. S. (1996), Hospitals: a hidden reseach system,Science and Public Policy, 23:5.Google Scholar
  3. Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. M., Sharp, M. &Martin, B.R. (1995),The Changing Shape of British Science, STEEP report No 3, SPRU, University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. (1995), The Classification of Interdisciplinary Journals: A new approach.Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informatics, River Forest, Ill, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. M. (1996), A systemic view of British Science,Scientometrics, 35: 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration?,Research Policy, 26:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Narin, F. (1976),Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Contract NSF C-627, National Science Foundation. Monograph: 456 pp. NTIS Accession #PB252339/AS.Google Scholar
  8. Narin, F., Whitlow, E. S. (1990),Measurement of Scientific Co-operation and Coauthorship in CEC-related areas of Science, Report EUR 12900, Office for Official Publications in the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  9. The Royal Society (1986),Evaluation of National Performance in Basic Research, Advisory Board for Research Councils Policy Studies No, Department of Education and Science (London, UK).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Katz
    • 1
  • Diana Hicks
    • 1
  1. 1.ESRC Centre for Science, Technology, Energy and Environment Policy, Science Policy Research UnitUniversity of SussexBrighton(UK)

Personalised recommendations