Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 371–388 | Cite as

Research and research impact of a technical university—A bibliometric study

  • A. Winkel Schwarz
  • S. Schwarz
  • R. J. W. Tijssen
Article

Abstract

The research output of the Danish Technical University (DTUa) has been studied as an aspect of the organization's research policy and visibility in its international context. Papers published in the three-year period (1992–94) were grouped according to 20 clusters of research areas. Using citation analysis techniques, the dynamics of citation frequencies, and a number of other features of the research system, like self-citation, research collaborations, relative impact on the international literature, etc., could be studied. The methods can be used to analyze institutional and national research efforts and to monitor effects of changing policies.

Keywords

Science Citation Index Citation Impact Research Impact Citation Window Citation Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Bourke L. Butler, Publication types, citation rates and evaluation,Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. E. De Bruin, A. Kint, M. Luwel, H. F. Moed, A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent,Research Evaluation, 3 (1993) 25–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. M. D. Collins, Quantitative assessment of departmental research, SEPSU Policy Study no. 5, London: The Royal Society, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Garfield, The significant scientific literature appears in a small core of journals, (http://165.123.33.33/yr1996/sept/research_960902.html).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Irvine, Evaluation of scientific institutions: lessons from a bibliometric study of UK technical universities. (pp. 141–168 in:M. Gibbons, L. Georghiou (Eds),The Evaluation of Scientific Research, Wiley, Chichester, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6a.
    R. K. Merton, The Matthew Effect in science,Science, 159 (5 Jan. 1968) 56–63.Google Scholar
  7. 6b.
    R. K. Merton, Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property,Isis, 179 (1988) 606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6c.
    R. K. Merton, The Thomas theorem and the Matthew Effect,Social Factors, 74 (1995) 379–422.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    H. F. Moed A. F. J. Van Raan, Indicators of research performance: applications of university research policy, (pp. 177–192 in:A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, Th.N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    A. J. Nederhof, R. F. Meijer, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. Van Raan, Research performance indicators for university departments: a study of an agricultural university,Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    T. B. Olsen, H. F. Hansen, T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Nordisk forskning i internasjonal sammenheng—en bibliometrisk beskrivelse av publisering og siteringar i naturvitenskaplig og medisinsk forskning,Tema Nord, 1994:618 [56 p.], Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    C. Le Pair, The citation gap of applicable science (pp. 537–553 in:A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    D. Pendlebury, Research papers—who is cited now?Science, 251 (1991) 25.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    A. F. J. Van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    E. Spruyt, R. E. De Bruin, H. F. Moed, Are bibliometric indicators appropriate policy tools in a young university?Higher Education Management, 8 (1996) 141–154.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    P. Vinkler, Management system for a scientific research institute based on the assessment of scientific publications,Research Policy, 15 (1986) 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Winkel Schwarz
    • 1
  • S. Schwarz
    • 2
  • R. J. W. Tijssen
    • 3
  1. 1.The Technical Knowledge Center of DenmarkTechnical University of DenmarkLyngby(Denmark)
  2. 2.Sigma InternationalCopenhagen(Denmark)
  3. 3.Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)Leiden University(The Netherlands)

Personalised recommendations