Abstract
This paper presents the findings of an author cocitation study in the field of information policy. Cocitation frequencies for 21 leading authors over the period 1972–1997 were obtained from the multidisciplinary databaseSocial Sciences Citation Index. The raw cocitation counts were transformed into a matrix of Pearson correlation profiles and subsequently visualised using multidimensional scaling techniques. An initial interpretation of the structure of the field of information policy was attempted, drawing on a range of non-bibliometric evidence. The results of a customised postal questionnaire to the data subjects themselves supports the present writer's allocation of the authors into thematic clusters. These results suggest that the social, collaborative and intellectual structure of information policy scholarship are highly convergent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Braman, The unique characteristics of information policy and their US consequences, In:V. Blake, R. Tjoumas, (Eds),Information Literacies for the Twenty-First Century, Hill, Boston, 1990, 47–77.
I. Rowlands,Mapping the Knowledge Base of Information Policy: Clusters of Documents, People and Ideas, PhD thesis, City University, 1998.
M. Browne, The field of information policy: (1) fundamental concepts,Journal of Information Science, 23 (1997) 261–275.
M. Browne, The field of information policy: (2) redefining the boundaries and methodologies,Journal of Information Science, 23 (1997) 339–351.
I. Rowlands, Some compass bearings for information policy orienteering,Aslib Proceedings, 50 (1998) 210–217.
H.D. White, K.W. Mccain, Visualizing a discipline: an author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (1998) 327–355.
H.D. White, Cocited author retrieval online: an experiment with the social indicators literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–171.
H.D. White, B.C. Griffith, Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–172.
H.D. White, B.C. Griffith, Authors as markers of intellectual space: co-citation in studies of science, technology and society,Journal of Documentation, 38 (1982) 255–272.
F.N. Kerlinger,Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1973.
H.D. White, K.W. Mccain, Bibliometrics,Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 24 (1989) 119–186.
S. Toulmin,Human Understanding, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.
R. Whitley, Umbrella and polytheistic scientific disciplines and their elites,Social Studies of Science, 6(1976) 471–497.
R. Whitley, The establishment and structure of the sciences: reputational organisations, In:N. Elias and others,Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, Ridel, Dordrecht, 1982, 141–157.
A.R. King, J. Brownell,The Curriculum and the Disciples of Knowledge, John Wiley, New York, 1966.
T. Shinn, Scientific disciplines and organisational specificity, In:N. Elias and others,Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, Ridel, Dordrecht, 1982, 165–195.
A. Becher,Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowlands, I. Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics 44, 533–546 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458494
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458494