Scientometrics

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 311–324 | Cite as

Relationship of mathematical programming with mathematics, economic/regional planning and other specialties

Article

Abstract

The references cited by papers in the four volumes of international journal titledMathematical Programming (Math. Prog.) published in 1997 were surveyed. The most frequently cited journal was found to be Math. Prog. itself. Generally, the cited references were found to be heavily concentrated on particular journals or books by particular publishers specialised in particular specialties. Despite the historical background having originated from mathematics and economics and having developed together with the development of business administration, works in these specialties were found to be rarely cited. The research field of mathematical programming was hereby judged to have formed its own closed specialty, having rather isolated itself from others in a self-sufficient way. Its shift from economic, regional or business planning to the experiment design or the engineering design was observed.

Keywords

Operation Research Mathematical Programming NASH Closed Circle Technical Paper 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Bourke, L. Butler, Institutions and the map of science: Matching university departments and fields of research,Research Policy, 26 (1998) 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. V. Budilova, J. A. Drogalina, A. T. Teriokhin, Principal trends in modern ecology and its mathematical tools: An analysis of publications,Scientometrics, 39, (1997) 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. F. Camerer, Does strategy research need game theory?,Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1991) 137–152.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. W. Churchman, R. L. Ackoff, E. L. Arnoff,Introduction to Operations Research, John Wiley, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Dorfman,Application of Linear Programming to the Theory of Firms, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1951.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Dorfman, P. A. Samuelson, R. Solow,Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Eto, Science revolution and Ortega hypothesis in developing countries,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Eto, A mathematical programming model to consider alternative crops,Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 19 (1991) 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. T. Falkingham, R. Reeves, Context analysis—A technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level.Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Fourer, Database structures for mathematical programming models,Decision Support Systems, 20 (1997) 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. L. Hitchcock, Distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities,Journal of Mathematical Physics, 20 (1940).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. V. Kantorovich,Mathematical Methods of Organizing and Planning Production Publication House of Leningrad University, Leningrad, 1939, andManagement Science, 6 (1960) 366–422.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. C. Koopman, Optimum utilization of the transporatation system,Econometrica, 17 (1949).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. C. Koopman (Ed.),Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, John Wiley, 1951.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. C. Korevaar, H. F. Moed, Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics,Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. W. Kuhn, Lectures on the theory of games,Annals of mathematic studies, 37, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. M. Morse, G. E. Kimball,Methods of Operations Research, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1951.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Nash, Noncooperative games,Annals of Mathematics, 54 (1951) 286–295.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. V. Nemtsov, N. A. Zorin Mathematical methods in psychiatric papers,Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. von Neumann, Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele,Mathematische Annalen, 100 (1928) 295–320.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. von Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Rotto, R. P. Morgan, An exploration of expert-based text analysis techniques for assessing industrial relevance in U.S. engineering dissertation abstracts.Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. P. Rumelt, D. Schendel, D. J. Teece, Strategic management and economics,Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1991) 5–29.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Wagner-Döbler, Time dependencies of Bradford distributions, Structures of journal output in 20th-century logic and 19th-century mathematics,Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. M. Weingartner, Mathematical Programming and the Analysis of Capital Budgeting, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Eto
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Policy and Planning SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukuba, Ibaraki(Japan)
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics, Department of ManagementChiba Keizai UniversityChiba-ken(Japan)

Personalised recommendations