Abstract
In this paper I discuss the relation between widely used “Scientometric” measures and “reputation” of research groups within the scientific community. To this goal, I present the result of the detailed comparison of two research groups of theoretical astrophysics in post-world-war-2nd Japan. Though one of the two groups gained much higher reputation within the research community, we could not find much difference in the macroscopic indices such as the number of publications or the average citation index. The two groups showed similar scores for these macroscopic indices. This result suggests that widely used quantitative measures of the productivity do not give meaningful measure for the actual contribution of a research group to science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. A. Abt, Institutional productivities,Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105 (1993) 794–798.
H. M. Collins, The possibilities of science policy,Social Studies of Science, 15 (1985) 554–558.
Y. Fujigaki, Filling the gap between discussion on science and scientist's everyday activities: Applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge,Social Science Information, 37 (1998), No. 1, 5–22.
J. Fukue, T. Kurokawa, The tree of Japanese astronomers,Astronomical Herald (In Japanese), 87 (1994) 195–204.
E. Garfield, Citation indexes for science,Science, 122 (1955) 108–111.
B. Latour, S. Woolgar,Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986.
L. Leydesdorff, Theory of Citations?,Scientometrics, 43 (1998) this volume.
M. H. Macroberts, B. R Macroberts, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151–172.
J. Makino, Y. Fujigaki, Y. Imai, Productivity of research groups-relation between citation analysis and reputation within research community (In Japanese),Japan Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 7 (1997) 85–100.
B. R. Martin, J. Irvine, Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61–90.
B. R. Martin, J. Irvine, Evaluating the evaluators: A reply to our critics,Social Studies of Science, 15 (1985) 558–575.
D. J. de Solla Price, Networks of scientific papers,Science, 149 (1955) 510–515.
D. Swinbanks, R. Nathan, R. Trendl, Western research assessment meets Asian culturesNature, 389 (1997) 113–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Comments on Theories of Citation?L. Leydesdorff,Scientometrics, 43 (1998) No. 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makino, J. Productivity of research groups-relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities. Scientometrics 43, 87–93 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458398
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458398