Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 883–898 | Cite as

The mathematics of radiation target analyses

  • E. S. Kempner


Radiation target theory has been extended to complex biochemical systems. Mathematical analyses are presented for multiple forms of biological active proteins, for the presence of large inhibitors or activators, for compounds which regulate rate or affinity and for multipe-step reactions. Several predictions of these models have been verified experimentally.


Radiation Dose Functional Unit Irradiate Sample Primary Ionization Target Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beauregard, G., A. Maret, R. Salvayre and M. Potier, 1987.Meth. Biochem. Anal. 32 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billheimer, J. T., D. A. Cromley and E. S. Kempner, 1990.J. Biol. Chem. 265, 8632–8635.Google Scholar
  3. Bolger, G. T., P. Skolnick and E. S. Kempner, 1989.Mol. Pharmacol. 36, 327–332.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, T. D. and E. S. Kempner, 1992.Anal. Biochem. 207, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harmon, J. T., C. R. Kahn, E. S. Kempner and W. Schlegel, 1980.J. Biol. Chem. 255 3412–3419.Google Scholar
  6. Kempner, E. S. 1988.Adv. Enzymol. 61 107–147.Google Scholar
  7. Kempner, E. S. 1993a.Quart. Rev. Biophys. 26, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kempner, E. S. 1993b.Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kempner, E. S. and S. Fleischer, 1989.Methods Enzymol. 172, 410–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kempner, E. S. and H. T. Haigler, 1982.J. Biol. Chem. 257, 13297–13299.Google Scholar
  11. Kempner, E. S. and H. T. Haigler, 1985. InGrowth and Maturation Factors, G. Guroff, (Ed), Vol. 3, pp. 149–173. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Kempner, E. S. and W. Schlegel, 1979.Anal. Biochem. 92, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kempner, E. S., R. Wood and R. Salovey, 1986.J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 24, 2337–2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lea, D. E. 1955.Actions of Radiations on Living Cells 2nd ed., pp. 69–99. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mandon, E., E. S. Kempner, M. Ishihara and C. B. Hirschberg, 1994.J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11729–11733.Google Scholar
  16. Ott, S., T. Costa and A. Herz, 1988.J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10524–10533.Google Scholar
  17. Pollard, E. C., W. R. Guild, F. Hutchinson and R. B. Setlow, 1995.Prog. Biophys. 5, 72–108.Google Scholar
  18. Potier, M., L. Thauvette, L. Michaud, S. Giroux and G. Beauregard, 1991.Biochemistry 30, 8151–8157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Potier, M., J.-F. Villemure and L. Thauvette, 1994.Biochem. J. 298, 571–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlegel, W., E. S. Kempner and M. Rodbell, 1979.J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5168–5176.Google Scholar
  21. Setlow, R. B. and E. C. Pollard, 1962.Molecular Biophysics Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. Simon, P., S. Swillens and J. E. Dumont, 1982.Biochem. J. 205, 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Swillens, S. 1986.Biochem. J. 233, 655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verkman, A. S., K. Skorecki and D. A. Ausiello. 1984.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Verkman, A. S., K. L. Skorecki and D. A. Ausiello. 1986.Am. J. Physiol. 250, C103-C114.Google Scholar
  26. Vessey, D. A. and E. S. Kempner, 1989.J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6334–6338.Google Scholar
  27. Zimmer, K. G. 1961.Studies on Quantitative Radiation Biology, H. D. Griffith (transl.), pp. 48–64. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Mathematical Biology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. S. Kempner
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Physical Biology National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations