# An evolutionary approach to enzyme kinetics: Optimization of ordered mechanisms

- 64 Downloads
- 24 Citations

## Abstract

A theoretical investigation is presented which allows the calculation of rate constants and phenomenological parameters in states of maximal reaction rates for unbranched enzymic reactions. The analysis is based on the assumption that an increase in reaction rates was an important characteristic of the evolution of the kinetic properties of enzymes. The corresponding nonlinear optimization problem is solved taking into account the constraint that the rate constants of the elementary processes do not exceed certain upper limits. One-substrate-one-product reactions with two, three and four steps are treated in detail. Generalizations concern ordered uni-uni-reactions involving an arbitrary number of elementary steps. It could be shown that depending on the substrate and product concentrations different types of solutions can be found which are classified according to the number of rate constants assuming in the optimal state submaximal values. A general rule is derived concerning the number of possible solutions of the given optimization problem. For high values of the equilibrium constant one solution always applies to a very large range of the concentrations of the reactants. This solution is characterized by maximal values of the rate constants of all forward reactions and by non-maximal values of the rate constants of all backward reactions. Optimal kinetic parameters of ordered enzymic mechanisms with two substrates and one product (bi-uni-mechanisms) are calculated for the first time. Depending on the substrate and product concentrations a complete set of solutions is found. In all cases studied the model predicts a matching of the concentrations of the reactants and the corresponding Michaelis constants, which is in good accordance with the experimental data. It is discussed how the model can be applied to the calculation of the optimal kinetic design of real enzymes.

## Keywords

Evolutionary Approach Product Concentration Reactant Concentration Elementary Step Order Rate Constant## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Literature

- Albery, W. J. and J. R. Knowles. 1976. Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency.
*Biochemistry***15**, 5631–5639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Belfiore, F. 1980.
*Enzyme Regulation and Metabolic Disease*. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar - Brocklehurst, K. 1977. Evolution of enzyme catalytic power: Characteristics of optimal catalysis evaluated for the simplest plausible kinetic model.
*Biochem. J.***163**, 111–116.Google Scholar - Burbaum, J. J. and J. R. Knowles. 1989. Internal thermodynamics of enzymes determined by equilibrium quench: Values of
*K*_{int}for enolase and creatine kinase.*Biochemistry***28**, 9306–9317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burbaum, J. J., R. T. Raines, W. J. Albery and J. R. Knowles. 1989. Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic effectiveness of an enzyme.
*Biochemistry***28**, 9293–9305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chin, J. 1983. Perfect enzymes: Is the equilibrium constant between the enzyme's bound species unity?
*J. Am. Chem. Soc.***105**, 6502–6503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cornish-Bowden, A. 1976. The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis.
*J. Mol. Biol.***101**, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Crowley, P. H. 1975. Natural selection and the Michaelis constant.
*J. theor. Biol.***50**, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eigen, M. and G. G. Hammes. 1963. Elementary steps in enzyme reactions.
*Adv. Enzymol.***25**, 1–38.Google Scholar - Ellington, A. D. and S. A. Benner. 1987. Free energy differences between enzyme bound states.
*J. theor. Biol.***127**, 491–506.Google Scholar - Fersht, A. R. 1974. Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementary.
*Proc. R. Soc.***187**, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fersht, A. R. 1985.
*Enzyme Structure and Mechanism*. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar - Heinrich, R. 1993. Mathematical Models of enzymic systems: Simulation, control analysis and optimization.
*Proceedings of the First World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts*. Tampa, U.S.A. (in press).Google Scholar - Heinrich, R. and E. Hoffmann. 1991. Kinetic parameters of enzymatic reactions in states of maximal activity; an evolutionary approach.
*J. theor. Biol.***151**, 249–283.Google Scholar - Heinrich, R., H.-G. Holzhütter and S. Schuster. 1987. A theoretical approach to the evolution and structural design of enzymatic networks; linear enzymatic chains, branched pathways and glycolysis of erythrocytes.
*Bull. math. Biol.***49**, 539–595.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heinrich, R., S. Schuster and H.-G. Holzhütter. 1991. Mathematical analysis of enzymic reaction systems using optimization principles.
*Eur. J. Biochem.***201**, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lindskog, S., L. E. Henderson, K. K. Kannan, A. Liljas, P. O. Nyman and B. Strandberg. 1971. Carbonic anhydrase. In
*The Enzymes*. P. D. Boyer (Ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Lowry, O. H. and J. V. Passonneau. 1964. The relationships between substrates and enzymes of glycolysis in brain.
*J. biol. Chem.***239**(1), 31–42.Google Scholar - Meléndez-Hevia, E. and N. V. Torres. 1988. Economy of design in metabolic pathways: Further remarks in the game of the pentose phosphate cycle.
*J. theor. Biol.***132**, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meléndez-Hevia, E., T. G. Waddell and F. Montero. 1993. Selection of enzymatic mechanisms which account for simplicity in the evolution of metabolic pathways.
*Proceedings of the First World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts*. Tampa, U.S.A. (in press).Google Scholar - Peller, L. and R. A. Alberty. 1959. Multiple intermediates in steady state enzyme kinetics. I. The mechanism involving a single substrate and product.
*J. Am. Chem. Soc.***81**, 5907–5914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pettersson, G. 1989. Effect of evolution on the kinetic properties of enzymes.
*Eur. J. Biochem.***184**, 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pettersson, G. 1991. Why do many Michaelian enzymes exhibit an equilibrium constant close to unity for the interconversion of enzyme-bound substrate and product?
*Eur. J. Biochem.***195**, 663–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pettersson, G. 1992. Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic efficiency of enzymes.
*Eur. J. Biochem.***206**, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schuster, S. and R. Heinrich. 1991. Minimization of intermediate concentrations as a suggested optimality principle for biochemical networks. I. Theoretical analysis.
*J. math. Biol.***29**, 425–442.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sel'kov, E. E., I. I. Goryagin, N. P. Kaimatchnikow, E. L. Shevelev and I. A. Yunus. 1989. Factographic data bank on enzymes and metabolic pathways.
*Stud. Biophys.***129**, 155–164.Google Scholar - Silverman, D. N. and S. Lindskog. 1988. The catalytic mechanism of carbonic anhydrase: Implications of a rate-limiting proteolysis of water.
*Acc. Chem. Res.***21**, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Somogyi, B. and S. Damjanovich. 1975. Relationship between the lifetime of an enzyme-substrate complex and the properties of the molecular environment.
*J. theor. Biol.***48**, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Srivastava, D. K. 1991. Physiological constraints on evolution of enzymes for cellular metabolic pathways.
*J. theor. Biol.***152**, 93–100.Google Scholar - Stackhouse, J., K. P. Nambiar, J. J. Burbaum, D. M. Stauffer and S. A. Benner. 1985. Dynamic transduction of energy and internal equilibria in enzymes: A reexamination of pyruvate kinase.
*J. Am. Chem. Soc.***107**, 2757–2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stucki, J. W. 1988. Thermodynamics of energy conversion in the cell. In
*From Chemical to Biological Organization*, M. Markus, S. C. Müller and G. Nicolis (Eds). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar