Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 252, Issue 3, pp 113–117 | Cite as

Uterine incision and maternal blood loss in preterm caesarean section

  • T. T. Lao
  • S. H. Halpern
  • E. T. Crosby
  • C. Huh
Originals

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare maternal blood loss, as reflected by the perioperative changes in haemoglobin (Hgb), the incidence of severe bleeding (estimated blood loss >1000 ml) at operation, and the need for blood transfusion, between patients who had classical caesarean section (CCS) and lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at 34 weeks gestation or less. The data from 31 women delivered by CSS between 25 and 34 weeks gestation were compared, in a retrospective case-control fashion, to another 31 women delivered by LSCS. Patients were matched for gestational age at delivery, the type of anaesthesia, and the prior use of tocolytic therapy. Excluded from the study were patients who had an antepartum haemorrhage or placenta praevia. There was a significantly greater reduction in maternal Hgb and an higher incidence of severe bleeding in the CSS group compared to the LSCS group (P<0.05). The results of this study suggest that for preterm caesarean sections, the classical incision is associated with increased blood loss compared to the lower segment incision.

Key words

Preterm caesarean section Uterine incision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Combs CA, Murphy EL, Laros RK jr (1991a) Factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage with vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 77:69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Combs CA, Murphy EL, Laros RK jr (1991b) Factors associated with hemorrhage in caesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 77:77–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewhurst CJ (1956) Reports of societies. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 63:125–129Google Scholar
  4. Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Hankins GDV, Patterson AR (1987) Effect of type of anaesthesia on blood loss at caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 69:328–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Haesslein HC, Goodlin RC (1979) Delivery of the tiny newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134:192–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Halperin ME, Moore DC, Hannah WJ (1988) Classical versus low segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section — maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:990–996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harley JMG (1980) Caesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 7:529–559Google Scholar
  8. Keeping JD, Morrison J, Chang AMZ (1980) Classical caesarean section in preterm deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 20:103–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morley GW (1961) Once a caesarean, always a caesarean. JAMA 178:1128–1131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Westgren M, Paul R (1985) Delivery of the low birth weight infant by caesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:752–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. T. Lao
    • 1
  • S. H. Halpern
    • 2
  • E. T. Crosby
    • 2
  • C. Huh
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of Toronto, Women’s College HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Anaesthesia, Regional Perinatal UnitUniversity of Toronto, Women’s College HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations