Abstract
A new mutation inEscherichia coli K12,isfA, is described, which causes inhibition of SOS functions. The mutation, discovered in a ΔpolA + mutant, is responsible for inhibition of several phenomena related to the SOS response inpolA + strains: UV- and methyl methanesulfonate-induced mutagenesis, resumption of DNA replication in UV-irradiated cells, cell filamentation, prophage induction and increase in UV sensitivity. TheisfA mutation also significantly reduces UV-induced expression of β-galactosidase fromrecA::lacZ andumuC′::lacZ fusions. The results suggest that theisfA gene product may affect RecA* coprotease activity and may be involved in the regulation of the termination of the SOS response after completion of DNA repair. TheisfA mutation was localized at 85 min on theE. coli chromosome, and preliminary experiments suggest that it may be dominant to the wild-type allele.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagdasarian M, Bailone A, Bagdasarian MM, Manning, PA, Lurz R, Timmis KN, Devoret R (1986) An inhibitor of SOS induction specified by a plasmid locus inEscherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5723–5726
Bagdasarian M, Bailone A, Angulo JF, Stolz P, Bagdasarian M, Devoret R (1992) PsiB, an anti-SOS protein is transiently expressed by the F sex factor during its transmission to anEscherichia coli K-12 recipient. Mol Microbiol 6(7):885–893
Bates H, Bridges BA (1991) Mutagenic DNA repair inEscherichia coli. XIX On the roles of RecA protein in ultraviolet light mutagenesis. Biochemie 73:485–489
Bates H, Randall SK, Rayssiguier Ch, Bridges BA, Goodman MF, Radman M (1989) Spontaneous and UV-induced mutations inEscherichia coli K-12 strains with altered or absent DNA polymerase I. J Bacteriol 171:2480–2484
Bębenek K, Janion C (1985) Ability of base analogs to induce the SOS response: effect of adam mutation and mismatch repair system. Mol Gen Genet 201:519–524
Bonner CA, Randall SK, Rayssiguier C, Radman M, Eritja R, Kaplan BE, McEntee K, Goodman MF (1988) Purification and characterisation of an inducibleE. coli DNA polymerase capable of insertion and bypass at abasic lession in DNA. J Biol Chem 263:18946–18952
Burckhardt SE, Woodgate R, Scheuermann RH, Echols H (1988) UmuD mutagenesis protein ofEscherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1811–1815
Counkell MB, Yanofsky C (1970) Increased frequency of deletions in DNA polymerase mutants ofEscherichia coli. Nature 228: 633–635
Craig NL, Roberts JW (1980)Escherichia coli recA protein-directed cleavage of phage λ repressor requires polynucleotide. Nature 283:26–30
Devoret M, Bailone A, Dutreix M, Moreau PL, Sommer S, Bagdasarian M (1988) Regulation of activation of RecA protein inE. coli. In: Fredberg EC, Hanawalt PC (eds) Mechanisms and consequences of DNA damage processing. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 437–443
Doudney CO (1971) Deoxyribonucleic acid replication in UV-damaged bacteria revisited. Mutat Res 12:121–127
Dragutin JS, Romac SP (1982) Powerful mutator activity of thepolA1 mutation within the histidine region ofEscherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 149:955–960
Dutriex M, Moreau PL, Bailone A, Galibert F, Battista JR, Walker GC, Devoret R (1989) NewrecA mutations that dissociate the various RecA protein activities inEscherichia coli provide evidence for an additional role for RecA protein in UV-mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 171:2415–2423
Echols H, Goodman MF (1990) Mutation induced by DNA damage: a many protein affair. Mutat Res 236:301–311
Golub EI, Bailone A, Devoret R (1988) A gene encoding an SOS inhibitor is present in different conjugative plasmids. J Bacteriol 170:4392–4394
Henry MF, Cronan JE Jr (1991) Direct and general selection for lysogens ofEscherichia coli by phage λ recombinant clones. J Bacteriol 173:3724–3731
Horii T, Ogawa T, Nakatani T, Hase T, Matsubara H, Ogawa H (1981) Regulation of SOS functions: purification ofE. coli LexA protein and determination of its specific site cleavaged by the RecA protein. Cell 27:515–522
Joyce CM, Grindley NDF (1984) Method for determining whether a gene ofEscherichia coli is essential: application to thepolA gene. J Bacteriol 158:636–643
Khidhir MA, Casaregola S, Holland IB (1985) Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ulraviolet-irradiatedE. coli: inhibition is independet ofrecA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function. Mol Gen Genet 199:133–140
Kim B, Little JW (1993) LexA and λ cI repressors as enzymes: specific cleavage in an intermolecular reaction. Cell 73:1165–1173
Kohara Y, Akiyama K, Isono K (1987) The physiological map of the wholeEscherichia coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell 50:495–508
Kornberg A, Baker TA (1992) DNA replication, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New York
Little JW (1984) Autodigestion of LexA and phage Lambda repressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1375–1379
Little JW (1991) Mechanism of specific LexA cleavage: autodigestion and the role of RecA coprotease. Biochimie 73:411–422
Little JW, Edmiston SH, Pacelli LZ, Mount DW (1980) Cleavage of theEscherichia coli lexA protein by therecA protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3225–3229
Livneh Z, Cohen-Fix O, Skaliter R, Elizur T (1993) Replication of damaged DNA and the molecular mechanism of ultraviolet light mutagenesis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 28:465–513
McNally KP, Freitag NE, Walker GC (1990) LexA-independent expression of a mutantmucAB operon. J Bacteriol 172:6223–6231
Meyn MS, Rossman T, Troll W (1977) A protease inhibitor blocks SOS functions inEscherichia coli: antipain prevents λ repressor inactivation, ultraviolet mutagenesis, and filamentous growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:1152–1156
Miller JH (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Mortelmans KE, Stocker BAD (1979) Segregation of the mutator property of plasmid R46 from its ultraviolet light-induced mutations. Mol Gen Genet 167:317–328
Nohmi T, Battista JR, Dodson LA, Walker GC (1988) RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagensis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1816–1820
Pietrzykowska I, Felczak M (1991) Considerations on the mechanisms of UV-induced mutagenesis. In: Douglas RH et al. (eds) Light in biology and medicine, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York, pp 485–494
Pietrzykowska I, Krych M, Shugar D (1983) Induction of SOS functions inE. coli by lesions resulting from incorporation of 5-bromouracil into DNA. Mutat Res 111:119–123
Pietrzykowska I, Krych M, Shugar D (1984) Mutagenesis induced by 5-bromouracil and methyl methane sulfonate: role of DNA polymerase I. Acta Biochim Pol 31:65–75
Roland KL, Little JW (1990) Reaction of LexA repressor with diisopropyl-fluorophosphate. A test of the serine protease model. J Biol Chem 265:12828–12835
Sassanfar M, Roberts JF (1990) Nature of the SOS-inducing signals inEscherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. J Mol Biol 212:79–96
Schendel PF, Defais M (1980) The role ofumuC gene product in mutagenesis by simple alkylating agents. Mol Gen Genet 177:661–665
Sedgwick SG, Bridges BA (1972) Survival, mutation and capacity to repair single strand DNA breaks after gamma irradiation in differentexr − strains ofEscherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 119:93–102
Sedgwick SG, Goodwin PA (1985) Difference in mutagenic and recombinational DNA repair in enterobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4172–4176
Shinagawa H, Iwasaki H, Kato T, Nakata A (1988) RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1806–1810
Singer M, Baker TA, Schnitzler G, Deischel SM, Goel M, Dove W, Jaacks KJ, Grossman AD, Erickson JW, Gross CA (1989) A collection of strains containing genetically linked alternating antibiotic resistance elements for genetic mapping ofE. coli. Microbiol Rev 53:1–24
Sweasy JB, Witkin EM, Sinha N, Roegner-Maniscalco V (1990) RecA protein ofEscherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity. J Bacteriol 172:3030–3036
Vogel HL, Bonner DM (1956) Acetylornithinase ofEscherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem 218:97–106
Walker GC (1984) Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage inEscherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 48:60–93
Walker GC (1987) The SOS response ofEscherichia coli. In:Escherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 1346–1357
Witkin EM, Roegner-Maniscalco V, Sweasy JB, McCall J (1987) Recovery from UV-light-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis requiresumuDC gene products inrecA718 mutant strains but not inrecA + strains ofEscherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6805–6809
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by B. J. Kilbey
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bębenek, A., Pietrzykowska, I. A new mutation inEscherichia coli K12,isfA, which is responsible for inhibition of SOS functions. Molec. Gen. Genet. 248, 103–113 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456619
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456619