Skip to main content
Log in

Fertility of U.S. farm women during the electrification era, 1930–1950

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research reported here examines the fertility of U.S. farm women during the period in which rural America became electrified. It suggests that electrification was relatedly indirectly to fertility through the impact it had on farm and home production modes, and also through its facilitation of more general socioeconomic change. The model is tested using Census and Agricultural Census data for 473 rural farm counties at three points in time — 1930, 1940, and 1950.

Overall, the results of multivariate analyses generally support the conceptual model. The effects of farm production/technology factors, electrification, and sociodemographic characteristics are evaluated using OLS. The effects of electrification net of the other variables are significant when subsamples of Southern and non-Southern counties are examined separately, with electrification related to lower fertility in Southern counties and higher fertility in non-Southern counties. The findings emphasize the importance of considering potential demographic impacts when introducting rural development projects in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeline, Erma (1980).People, Their Power: The Rural Electric Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: National Rural Electrical Cooperative Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnum, Howard N. and Lyn Squire (1979).A Model of an Agricultural Household. World Bank Staff Occasional Papers, No. 2. Washington, D.C., World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. Clayton (1980).Electricity for Rural America. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, Marquis (1952).The Farmer Takes a Hand, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Susan (1979).Fertility and Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. Horace (1964). ‘The negro leaves the South,’Demography 1: 273–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, Sarah F. and Warren C. Robinson (1985). ‘Rural electrification and fertility change’,Population Research and Policy Review 4: 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrin, Alexandro N. (1979) ‘Rural electrification and fertility change in the southern Philippines,’Population and Development Review 5: 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrin, Alexandro N. and Amanda Te (1985). ‘Rural electrification, fertility change, and family planning practice in the southern Philippines: preliminary analysis,’ in Richard E. Bilsborrow and Pamela F. DeLargy (eds.),Impact of Rural Development Projects on Demographic Behavior. New York: United Nations Fund for Population Activities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Maurice J. and Martin O'Connell (1978).Perspectives on American Fertility. Current Population Reports, P-23, No. 73. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Eva (1975). ‘The impact of agricultural change on demographic development in the Third World’, in Leon Tabah (ed.),Population Growth and Economic Development in the Third World. Leige, Belgium: Ordina Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmore, James A. and Robert W. Gardner (1983).Measuring Mortality, Fertility, and Natural Increase. Honolulu: East-West Center Population Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piampiti, Suwanlee (1984).Fertility Effects of Electrification inNortheast Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Population Council-USAID Fertility Impacts of Development Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutzer, Eric (1986). ‘Fertility and agricultural structure: rural America in 1930,’Rural Sociology 51: 156–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Rodger R. and J. Allan Beegle (1972).Differential Fertility in a Metropolitan Society. Morgantown: West Virginia University, Rural Sociological Society Monograph Number 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, Ronald and James A. Sweet (1977).Postwar Fertility Trends and Differentials in the U.S. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizk, Ibrahim A., C. Shannon Stokes, and Merwyn R. Nelson (1982). ‘The influence of individual and community-level child mortality on fertility in Egypt,’Studies in Comparative International Development 17: 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, John Kerr (1940). ‘Rural electrification: a field for social research,’Rural Sociology 5: 411–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutjer, Wayne A. and C. Shannon Stokes (1984).Rural Development and Human Fertility. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slesinger, Doris P. (1974). ‘The relationship of fertility to measures of metropolitan dominance: a new look,’Rural Sociology 39: 350–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975).Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1981).Farm Population of the United States: 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Department of Economics and Population Issues Research Center

This research was supported by the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Washington, D.C., and by the Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources and the Institute for Policy Research and Evaluation of the Pennsylvania State University. The authors are grateful to Gordon De Jong, Daniel Lichter, Wayne Schutjer, and C. Shannon Stokes for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornwell, G.T., Robinson, W.C. Fertility of U.S. farm women during the electrification era, 1930–1950. Popul Res Policy Rev 7, 277–291 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456106

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456106

Keywords

Navigation