Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 223–238 | Cite as

Government involvement in the economy and the distribution of income: A cross-national study

  • Robert L. Boyd


This study explores the effect of government involvement in the economy, as measured by central government expenditures as a percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), on the distribution of income. It is hypothesized that state spending — in the form of transfer payments to firms and households, government purchases, and military spending — will have a negative influence on income inequality only at high levels of economic development. Multivariate analysis confirms this hypothesis. The results show that government expenditures as a percent of GDP and level of industrialization interact to produce a negative impact on income inequality. This finding, moreover, holds up after additional investigation for possible OLS assumption violations, sample dependence of results, and model misspecification.


Gross Domestic Product Ordinary Little Square Income Inequality Political Participation Government Expenditure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alker, H. and B.M. Russett (1966). “Indicies for comparing income inequality”, in R.L. Merritt and S. Rokkan (eds.),Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Belsley, D.A., E. Kuh and R.E. Welsch (1980).Regression Diagnostics. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  3. Bollen, K.A. and R.W. Jackman (1985a). “Political democracy and the size distribution of income”,American Sociological Review 50: 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K.A. and R.W. Jackman (1985b). “Regression diagnostics: an expository treatment of outliers and influential cases”,Sociological Methods and Research 13: 510–542.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbenner, M. (1971).Income Distribution Theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  6. Cutright, P. (1965). “Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs”,American Journal of Sociology 70: 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutright, P. (1967a). “Inequality: a cross-national analysis”,American Sociological Review 32: 563–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutright, P. (1967b). “Income redistribution: a cross-national analysis”,Social Forces 46: 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firebaugh, G. (1980). “The case of the missing-values card and other mysteries: another look at the effect of government spending on income inequality”,American Sociological Review 45: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedland, R. and J. Sanders (1985). “The public economy and economic growth in Western market economies”,American Sociological Review 50: 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galbraith, J.K. (1958).The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Gilder, G. (1984).The Spirit of Enterprise New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Gurr, T. (1966).New Error-Compensated Measures for Comparing Nations: Some Correlates of Civil Violence. Princeton, New Jersey: Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Hewitt, C. (1977). “The effect of political democracy and social democracy on equality in industrial societies: A cross-national comparison”,American Sociological Review 42: 450–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackman, R.W. (1974). “Political democracy and social equality: A comparative analysis”,American Sociological Review 39: 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackman, R.W. (1975).Politics and Social Inequality: A Comparative Study. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Jackman, R.W. (1980a). “Socialist parties and income inequality in Western industrial societies”,Journal of Politics 42: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackman, R.W. (1980b). “Keynesian government intervention and income inequality”,American Sociological Review 45: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, A.C. Jr., M.B. Johnson and R.C. Buse (1987).Econometrics: Basic and Applied. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Kerr, C., J.T. Dunlap, F. Harbison and C. Myers (1960).Industrialism and Industrial Man. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Keynes, J.M. (1936).The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  22. Kuznets, S. (1955). “Economic growth and income inequality”,The American Economic Review 45: 1–28.Google Scholar
  23. Kuznets, S. (1963). “Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations, VIII: The distribution of income by size”,Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11: 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenski, G. (1966).Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Lipset, S.M. (1960).Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
  26. Lipset, S.M. (1964). “The changing class structure and contemporary European politics”, in S.R. Graubard (ed.),A New Europe? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  27. Lipset, S.M. and R. Bendix (1959).Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marsden, P.V. (1982). “Conditional effects in regression models”, in P.V. Marsden (ed.),Linear Models in Social Research. Beverly Hills, California: SageGoogle Scholar
  29. Paukert, F. (1973). “Income distribution at different levels of development: A survey of evidence”,International Labour Review 108: 97–125.Google Scholar
  30. Rubinson, R. (1976). “The world economy and the distribution of income within states: a cross-national study”,American Sociological Review 41: 638–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rubinson, R. and D. Quinlan (1977). “Democracy and social inequality: A reanalysis”,American Sociological Review 42: 611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stack, S. (1978). “The effect of direct government involvement in the economy on the degree of income inequality: A cross-national study”,American Sociological Review 43: 880–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stack, S. (1979). “The effects of political participation and socialist party strength on the degree of income inequality”,American Sociological Review 44: 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, C.L. and D.A. Jodice (1983).World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators III. Ann. Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  35. Wallerstein, I. (1974).The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wallerstein, I. (1979). “Present state of the world debate on world inequality”, in I. Wallerstein (ed.),The Capitalist World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wanniski, J. (1979). “Taxes, revenues, and the Laffer curve”, in A.B. Laffer and J.P. Seymour (eds.),The Economics of the Tax Revolt. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  38. Weede, E. (1980). “Beyond misspecification in sociological analyses of income inequality”,American Sociological Review 45: 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Boyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations