Skip to main content
Log in

Individual and structural explanations of poverty

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article illustrates the difference between individual and structural accounts of poverty in the U.S. Some of the correlates of poverty among individuals are job loss, low skills, female family head, discrimination against blacks and hispanics, family size, and age at marriage. The structural factors producing a high rate of poverty are the reproduction of the class system, macroeconomic policies, the vicious circle of poverty, the structure of the electoral process, the structure of the economy, institutionalized gender discrimination, and institutionalized ethnic discrimination. Thus, the variables accounting for each phenomenon are different. A theoretical rationale for the relationship between social structure and rates of events is presented, and similarities between the approach used here and research in other disciplines are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakke, E.W. (1940).The Unemployed Worker. New Haven, Ct.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E.M., P.M. Horan, and C.M. Tolbert (1978) ‘Stratification in a Dual Economy’,American Sociological Review 43: 704–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1975).Human Capital. 2nd Edition, New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeghley, L. (1983).Living Poorly in America. New York: Preager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeghley, L. (1984). ‘Illusion and Reality in the Measurement of Poverty’,Social Problems 31: 312–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeghley, L. (1986). ‘Social Class and Political Participation: A Review and an Explanation’,Sociological Forum 1: 496–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeghley, L. and C. Sellers (1986). ‘Adolescents and Sex: A Structural Theory of Premarital Sex in the United States’,Deviant Behavior 7: 313–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeghley, L., E. Van Elsor, and E.W. Bock (1981). ‘The Correlates of Religiosity among Black and White Americans”,Sociological Quarterly 22: 403–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benokraitis, N., and J.R. Feagin (1986)Modern Sexism: Blatant, Subtle, and Covert Discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibb, R., and W. Form (1977). ‘The Effects of Industrial, Occupational, and Sex Stratification on Wages in Blue Collar Markets’,Social Forces 55: 974–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J., and K. Davis (1964). ‘Norms, Values, and Sanctions’, in R.E.L. Faris (ed.),Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. (1975).Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., T.C. Blum, and J.E. Schwartz (1982). ‘Heterogeneity and Intermarriage’,American Sociological Review 47: 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., and O.D. Duncan (1967).The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., and R.K. Merton (1981).Continuities in Structural Inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.W. (1981). ‘Decline in U.S. Voter Turnout: Structural Explanations’,American Politics Quarterly 9: 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1953).Child Care and the Growth of Love. Baltimore MD: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C.G.A. (1985),Positivism in Social Theory and Research. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W.D. (1980) ‘The Appearance and Disappearance of the American Voter’, in R. Rose (ed.),Electoral Participation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M., L. Datcher, and G.J. Duncan (1980). ‘Most Workers Find Jobs Through Word of Mouth’,Monthly Labor Review 103 (August): 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J. (1984).Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895).Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1897).Suicide. New York: Free Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1984).Blacks and Whites: Narrowing the Gap? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J.R., and C.B. Feagin (1978).Discrimination American Style. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, D.L., and R.M. Hauser (1978).Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1972). ‘The Positive Functions of Poverty’,American Journal of Sociology 78: 275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, H. (1983).Full Employment and Public Policy: The United States and Sweden. Boston: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1972).Theories of Poverty and Unemployment. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayghe, H. (1986). ‘Rise in Mother's Labor Force Activity Includes those with Infants’,Monthly Labor Review 109(February): 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner, R., and L. Thurow (1982).Economics Explained. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.A. (1977). ‘Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy’,American Political Science Review 71: 1467–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A., and D.H. Swank (1983). ‘Civil Disorder, Relief Mobilization, and AFDC Caseloads: A Reexamination of the Piven and Cloward Thesis’,American Journal of Sociology 27: 695–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, R., and R.L. Kaufman (1982). ‘Economic Dualism: A Critical Review’,American Sociological Review 47: 727–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (1971).The Winning of the Midwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M.E., and D.M. Olson (1978).American State Political Parties and Elections. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.F., et al. (1985). ‘Teenage Pregnancy in Developed Countries: Determinants and Policy Implications’,Family Planning Perspectives 17: 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnig, A.D., and B.O. Walter (1977). ‘Municipal Elections: Registration, Incumbent Success, and Voter Participation’, inMunicipal Yearbook. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. (1967).Power and Privilege. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1969). ‘The Culture of Poverty’, in D.P. Moynihan (ed.),On Understanding Poverty, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J.K., and G.H. Elder, Jr. (1983). ‘Economic Hardship and Marital Relations in the 1930s’,American Sociological Review 48:343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1968).Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, E.F. (1987). ‘Workers at the Minimum Wage or Less: Who They are and the Jobs They Hold’,Monthly Labor Review 110(July): 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., and H. Pachon (1985).Hispanics in the United States. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M.E. (1982).Participatory Pluralism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1954). ‘The Kinship System in the United States,’ in T. Parsons,Essays in Sociological Theory. Revised edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J.T. (1986).America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1985. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L.I., E.G. Menaghan, M.A. Lieberman, and J.T. Mullin (1981). ‘The Stress Process’,Journal of Health and Social Behavior 22: 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. Fox, and R. Cloward (1971).Regulating the Poor. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.B. (1980). ‘Voter Turnout in Thirty Democracies: Partisan, Legal, and Socioeconomic Differences’, in R. Rose (ed.),Eelectoral Participation. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1976)Worlds of Pain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (1984). ‘Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe’,Foreign Affairs 62: 257–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snipp, C.M. (1985). ‘Occupational Mobility and Social Class: Insights from Men's Career Mobility,’.American Sociological Review 50: 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1975). ‘Merton's Theory of Social Structure’, in L.S. Coser (ed.),The Idea of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.L. and S.H. Schneider (1986). ‘Nuclear Winter Reappraised’,Foreign Affairs 64: 981–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F.J. (1920).The Significance of the Frontier in American History. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H. (1972).Patterns of Social Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1986). ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Ethnic Antagonism’,Sociological Forum 1: 403–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H. (1986a).The Structure of Sociological Theory. Fourth Edition: Chicago: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H., and L. Beeghley (1981).The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (1986).Employment and Earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (1985). ‘Money Income and Poverty Status of Families and Persons in the United States, 1984’,Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 149, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (1985a). ‘Characteristics of Households Receiving Selected Noncash benefits: 1984’, Current Population Report, Series P-60, No. 150. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (1987). ‘Money Income and Poverty Status of Families and Persons in the United States, 1986’,Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 157. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor (1985).Monthly Labor Review 108(October):85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor (1985a).Monthly Labor Review 108(December):61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, B. (1978)Hustling and Other Hard Work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., and N.H. Nie (1972).Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1905).The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribners, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1920).Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1921).General Economic History. New York: Collier Books, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Lenore (1985)The Divorce Revolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, D., and M. Webster (1970). ‘Theoretical Concepts and Observables’,American Sociological Review 35: 748–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M. (1970).American Society. Third edition. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E., and S.J. Rosenstone (1980).Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V.A. (1985).Pricing the Priceless Child. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beeghley, L. Individual and structural explanations of poverty. Popul Res Policy Rev 7, 201–222 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456102

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456102

Keywords

Navigation