Summary
The effects of seven neuroleptic drugs on conditioned behaviour were studied in rats by means of a lever-press shock-avoidance procedure (shock-shock 20 sec; response-shock 20 sec) with alternate reinforcement and extinction periods. All seven drugs inhibited the lever-press response and the shock-avoidance rate; their order of potency was trifluperidol > droperidol > haloperidol > pimozide > fluanisone > chlorpromazine > pipamperone.
For all seven drugs, the response rate during the extinction periods was a more sensitive indicator of drug effect than the response rate during the reinforcement periods. Analysis of the temporal distribution of the IRT's shows that IRT's of 0–5″ and of 6–15″ were more sensitive to drug effects than IRT's of 16–20″ and of > 20″.
The introduction of extinction periods together with the analysis of IRT's rendered the Sidman avoidance procedure the most sensitive test available for the quantitative evaluation of the potency of neuroleptic drugs in rats. The qualitative differences between the neuroleptics studied were less pronounced. There is some indication, however, that specific neuroleptics (e.g. pimozide) inhibit the response rate to about the same extent during both reinforcement and extinction periods, while aspecific neuroleptics (e.g. pipamperone) are more active inhibitors of the responses during extinction than during the corresponding reinforcement periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brugmans, J.: A multicentric clinical evaluation of pimozide. Acta neurol. belg.68, 875–887 (1968).
Heinrich, K., Quaschning, M. (in preparation) (1969).
Janssen, P. A. J.: Chemical and pharmacological classification of neuroleptic drugs. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Week on Neuroleptics (SIN). (in press) (1969).
—, Niemegeers, C. J. E., Schellekens, K. H. L.: Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillizers) from animal data? — Part I: Neuroleptic activity spectra for rats. Arzneimittel-Forsch.15, 104–117 (1965a).
— — —: Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillizers) from animal data? — Part II: Neuroleptic activity spectra for dogs. Arzneimittel-Forsch.15, 1196–1206 (1965b).
Janssen, P. A. J., Niemegeers, C. J. E., Schellekens, K. H. L.: Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillizers) from animal data? — Part III: The subcutaneous and oral activity in rats and dogs of 56 neuroleptic drugs in the jumping box test. Arzneimittel-Forsch.16, 339–346 (1966).
— — —, Lenaerts, F.: Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillizers) from animal data? — Part IV: An improved experimental design for measuring the inhibitory effects of neuroleptic drugs on amphetamine—or apomorphine—induced “chewing” and “agitation” in rats. Arzneimittel-Forsch.17, 841–854 (1967).
— — — —, Dresse, A., Pinchard, A., Schaper, W. K. A., Van Nueten, J. M., Verbruggen, F. J.: Pimozide, a chemically novel, highly potent and orally long-acting neuroleptic drug. Arzneimittel-Forsch.18, 261–279 (1968).
Niemegeers, C. J. E., Verbruggen, C. J. E., Janssen, P. A. J.: The influence of various neuroleptic drugs on schock avoidance responding in rats — I. Nondiscriminated Sidman avoidance procedure. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.)16, 161–174 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niemegeers, C.J.E., Verbruggen, F.J. & Janssen, P.A.J. The influence of various neuroleptic drugs on shock avoidance responding in rats. Psychopharmacologia 16, 175–182 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456043
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456043