Skip to main content

Responses of barley, pea, and maize to inoculation with different vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in irradiated soil

Summary

The efficiency of different VAM fungi was investigated by inoculating barley, pea, and maize with different VAM fungi in irradiated soil in pots buried in the field. VAM frequency, growth and nutrient uptake were measured.

In barleyGlomus epigaeus (CA) andG. macrocarpus (CA) were the most efficient out of 11 tested species and increased yield of grain by 24% and 21%, though they were not significant according to oneway analysis of variance. In pea, yield of grain was significantly increased from 46% to 104% (mean=68%) by 7 out of 10 tested species and by 105% by application of P fertilizer. The most efficient species wereG. epigaeus (CA),G. mosseae (GB), andG. etunicatus (CA). In maizeG. mosseae (GB) andG. caledonius (DK) increased total yield significantly by 59% and 47% in one experiment and in another experiment yield of cob was increased by 68% byG. mosseae (GB), 72% byG. caledonius (DK), and by 153% by application of P fertilizer.

This experiment demonstrated that responsiveness to inoculation by VAM fungi differed among plant species, and that efficiency of different VAM fungi differed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ambler J R and Young J L 1977 Techniques for determining root length infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 551–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke C and Mosse B 1981 Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. XII Field inoculation responses of barley at two soil P levels. New Phytol. 87, 695–703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerdemann J W 1975 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae.In The Development and Function of Roots. Eds. J G Torrey and D T Clarkson, Academic Press, London, pp. 575–591.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilmore A E 1971 The influence of endotropic mycorrhizae on the growth of peach seedlings. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 96, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hall I R 1978 Effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on two varieties of maize and one of sweetcorn. N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 21, 517–519.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen A 1982 Influence of four vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on nutrient uptake and growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare). New Phytol. 90, 45–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert D H, Baker D E and Cole H Jr 1979 The role of mycorrhizae in the interactions of phosphorus with zinc, copper and other elements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 976–980.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nie N H, Hull C H, Jenkins J G, Steinbrenner K and Bent D H 1975 Statistical Package for Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedures for clearning roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schierup H H and Jensen A 1981 Vejledning i kemisk og fysisk analyse af jordprøver og plantemateriale. Botanisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, 201 p.

  11. Stribley D P, Tinker P B and Rayner J H 1980 Relation of internal phosphorus concentration and plant weight in plants infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 86, 261–266.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Timmer L W and Leyden R F 1980 The relationship of mycorrhizal infection to phosphorus-induced copper deficiency in sour orange seedlings. New Phytol. 85, 15–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, A. Responses of barley, pea, and maize to inoculation with different vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in irradiated soil. Plant Soil 78, 315–323 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450365

Key words

  • Barley
  • Maize
  • Pea
  • P uptake
  • VAM efficiency
  • VA-mycorrhiza