Plant and Soil

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 315–323 | Cite as

Responses of barley, pea, and maize to inoculation with different vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in irradiated soil

  • Anni Jensen


The efficiency of different VAM fungi was investigated by inoculating barley, pea, and maize with different VAM fungi in irradiated soil in pots buried in the field. VAM frequency, growth and nutrient uptake were measured.

In barleyGlomus epigaeus (CA) andG. macrocarpus (CA) were the most efficient out of 11 tested species and increased yield of grain by 24% and 21%, though they were not significant according to oneway analysis of variance. In pea, yield of grain was significantly increased from 46% to 104% (mean=68%) by 7 out of 10 tested species and by 105% by application of P fertilizer. The most efficient species wereG. epigaeus (CA),G. mosseae (GB), andG. etunicatus (CA). In maizeG. mosseae (GB) andG. caledonius (DK) increased total yield significantly by 59% and 47% in one experiment and in another experiment yield of cob was increased by 68% byG. mosseae (GB), 72% byG. caledonius (DK), and by 153% by application of P fertilizer.

This experiment demonstrated that responsiveness to inoculation by VAM fungi differed among plant species, and that efficiency of different VAM fungi differed.

Key words

Barley Maize Pea P uptake VAM efficiency VA-mycorrhiza 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ambler J R and Young J L 1977 Techniques for determining root length infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke C and Mosse B 1981 Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. XII Field inoculation responses of barley at two soil P levels. New Phytol. 87, 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerdemann J W 1975 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae.In The Development and Function of Roots. Eds. J G Torrey and D T Clarkson, Academic Press, London, pp. 575–591.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilmore A E 1971 The influence of endotropic mycorrhizae on the growth of peach seedlings. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 96, 35–38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall I R 1978 Effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on two varieties of maize and one of sweetcorn. N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 21, 517–519.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jensen A 1982 Influence of four vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on nutrient uptake and growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare). New Phytol. 90, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lambert D H, Baker D E and Cole H Jr 1979 The role of mycorrhizae in the interactions of phosphorus with zinc, copper and other elements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 976–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nie N H, Hull C H, Jenkins J G, Steinbrenner K and Bent D H 1975 Statistical Package for Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedures for clearning roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schierup H H and Jensen A 1981 Vejledning i kemisk og fysisk analyse af jordprøver og plantemateriale. Botanisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, 201 p.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stribley D P, Tinker P B and Rayner J H 1980 Relation of internal phosphorus concentration and plant weight in plants infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 86, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Timmer L W and Leyden R F 1980 The relationship of mycorrhizal infection to phosphorus-induced copper deficiency in sour orange seedlings. New Phytol. 85, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anni Jensen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Botanical InstituteUniversity of AarhusRisskovDenmark
  2. 2.Agricultural Research DepartmentRisø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations