Skip to main content
Log in

Order parameter and static susceptibility of spin glasses in mean-field theory

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento D

Summary

The spin glass phase of a system of Ising spins interacting via the RKKY interaction is investigated at a mean-field level. The results around the transition temperature are at sharp variance with those previously found by other authors and suggest a first-order transition. The static susceptibility is found to deviate from Fischer's predictions. A test of the validity of scaling predictions is also performed.

Riassunto

La fase di ≪spin glass≫ di un sistema di spin di Ising interagenti tramite un'interazione del tipo RKKY è studiata in campo medio. I risultati nell'intorno della temperatura di transizione sono in netto contrasto con quelli in precedenza trovati da altri autori e suggeriscono una transizione del prim'ordine. Si trova che la suscettività statica devia dalle predizioni di Fischer. Si effettua anche una verifica della validità delle leggi di scala.

Резюме

На уровне среднего поля исследуется фаза спинового стекла для системы спинов Изинга, взаимодействующих через RKKY взаумодействие. Полученные результаты для температуры перехода сильно отличаются от результатов, полученных ранее другими авторами, и предполагают переход первого порядка. Обнаружено, что статическая восприимчивость отличается от предсказаний Фишера. Также проводится проверка справедливости предсказаний подобия.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. F. Edwards andP. W. Anderson:J. Phys. F,5, 965 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Sherrington andS. Kirkpatrick:Phys. Rev. Lett.,35, 1972 (1975);Phys. Rev. B,17, 4384 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. Thouless, P. W. Anderson andR. G. Palmer:Philos. Mag.,35, 593 (1977).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. L. de Almeida andD. J. Thouless:J. Phys. A,11, 983 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. van Hemmen andR. G. Palmer:J. Phys. A,12, 563 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Parisi:J. Phys. A,13, 1103 (1980), and references quoted therein;Proceedings of the International Conference on Disordered Systems and Localization, Rome, May 1981, to be published.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Parisi andG. Toulouse:J. Phys. (Paris) Lett.,41, L361 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Vannimeus, G. Toulouse andG. Parisi:J. Phys. (Paris),42, 565 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Marshall:Phys. Rev.,118, 1519 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. W. Klein andR. Brout:Phys. Rev.,132, 2412 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. W. Klein:Phys. Rev.,173, 552 (1968);Phys. Rev. B,14, 5008 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Riess andM. W. Klein:Phys. Rev. B,15, 6001 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. W. Klein, L. J. Schowalter andP. Shukla:Phys. Rev. B,19, 1492 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Corbelli andG. Morandi:Solid State Commun.,29, 589 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. —:Nuovo Cimento B,54, 129 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Equation (2) was derived by using, as in the rest of the literature, a short-distance cut-offd on the interaction, chosen here for simplicity to be such that 2k F d∼1, whence the lower bounds of integration in eqs. (3) and (4). One might dispense from the cut-off by using the full form of the RKKY interaction,i.e. by writing (x cosx−sinx)/x 4 in place of (cosx)/x 3 in the above equations and setting the lower bounds of integration to zero. However, the original physical problem being formulated on a lattice, the use of a cut-off of the order of the lattice parameter seems to be more natural.

  17. G. Corbelli andG. Morandi:Physica D (The Hague),3, 590 (1981).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Kinzel andK. H. Fischer:J. Phys. C,11, 2115 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. H. Fischer:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 1438 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. In a cut-off-free treatment (see footnote (15)) Equation (2) was derived by using, as in the rest of the literature, a short-distance cut-offd on the interaction, chosen here for simplicity to be such that 2k F d∼1, whence the lower bounds of integration in eqs. (3) and (4). One might dispense from the cut-off by using the full form of the RKKY interaction,i.e. by writing (x cosx−sinx)/x 4 in place of (cosx)/x 3 in the above equations and setting the lower bounds of integration to zero. However, the original physical problem being formulated on a lattice, the use of a cut-off of the order of the lattice parameter seems to be more natural. one would instead obtain Γ(0)=−1.

  21. J. Souletie andR. Tournier:J. Low Temp. Phys.,1, 95 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbelli, G., Lovecchio, G. & Morandi, G. Order parameter and static susceptibility of spin glasses in mean-field theory. Il Nuovo Cimento D 1, 225–234 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450081

Keywords

Navigation