Skip to main content
Log in

Man-induced gradient adjustment of the South Fork Forked Deer River, west Tennessee

  • Published:
Environmental Geology and Water Sciences

Abstract

Channel modifications from 1968 to 1969 on the South Fork Forked Deer River in western Tennessee have caused upstream degradation, downstream aggradation, and bank failures along the altered channels, adjacent reaches, and tributaries. The result of these adjustments is a general decrease in gradient as the channel attempts to absorb the imposed increase in energy conditions created by channelization.

Headward degradation at a rate of approximately 2.57 km/yr on the South Fork Forked Deer River caused from 1.52 m to about 3.14 m of incision over a 13.5 km reach from 1969 to 1981. As a consequence of substantially increased sediment supply, approximately 2.13 m of aggradation was induced downstream of this reach during the same period. This accumulation represents a 60% recovery of bed level at the downstream site since the completion of channel work in 1969.

Gradient adjustment with time is described by exponential decay functions. The length of time required for adjustment to some new quasi-equilibrium condition is computed by these decay functions and is about 20 years from the completion of channel work. Adjusted slopes are less than predisturbed values, probably because straightened channels dissipate less energy by friction, allowing more energy for sediment transport. An equivalent sediment load, therefore, can be transported at a considerably gentler slope. The predisturbed slope exceeds the adjusted slope by an order of magnitude on the downstream reach of the South Fork Forked Deer River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Alexander, David, 1981, Threshold of critical power in streams: Discussion and reply. Geol. Soc. America Bull., part 1, v. 92, p. 310–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blench, T., 1973, Factors controlling size, form and slope of stream channels.In Fluvial processes and sedimentation. Hydrology Symposium, 9th, Edmonton, Canada, 1973, Proceedings, p. 421–439.

  • Borusk, O. A., and R. S. Chalov, 1973, Downcutting of the Lena River channel: Soviet Hydrology, no. 5, p. 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, W. B., 1979. Threshold of critical power in streams. Geol. Soc. America Bull., part 1, v. 90, p. 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidinger, L. L., and A. E. Morgan, 1912, Drainage problems of Wolf, Hatchie and South Fork of Forked Deer Rivers, in west Tennessee.In The resources of Tennessee. Tennessee Geol. Survey, v. 2, no. 6, p. 231–249.

  • Keller, E. A., 1976, Channelization: Environmental, geomorphic, and engineering aspects.In Coates, D. R., ed., Geomorphology and engineering. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc., p. 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, E. W., 1955, The importance of fluvial morphology in hydraulic engineering. Am. Soc. Civil Engineers Proc., v. 81, no. 795, 17 p.

  • Livesey, R. H., 1976, The sedimentary influence of tributary streams, growth of the Niobrara Delta.In Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Conference, 3rd, Denver, Colorado, March 22–25, Proceedings. Water Resources Council, p. 4-127–4-137.

  • Mackin, J. H., 1948, Concept of a graded river. Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 59, p. 463–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramser, C. E., 1929, Flow of water in drainage channels. U.S. Dept. Agriculture Tech. Bull. no. 129, 101 p.

  • Robbins, C. H., and Andrew Simon, 1983, Man-induced channel adjustment in Tennessee streams. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82-4098, 129 p.

  • Schumm, S. A., and R. W. Lichty, 1965, Time, space and causality in geomorphology. Am. Jour. Sci., v. 263, p. 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. R., W. J. Perry, J. A. McCabe, and O. G. Lara, 1965. Low-flow characteristics of streams in the Mississippi embayment in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Illinois,with a section on Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 448-H, p. H1–H36.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1980, Summary report final: Obion-Forked Deer River basin, Tennessee. Soil Conservation Service, 43 p.

  • Wilson, K. V., 1979, Changes in channel characteristics, 1938–74, of the Homochitto River and tributaries, Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 79-554, 18 p.

  • Yang, C. T., 1976, Minimum unit stream power and fluvial hydraulics. Am. Soc. Civil Engineers Proc., Jour. Hydraulics Div., v. 102, no. HY7, p. 919–934.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, A., Robbins, C.H. Man-induced gradient adjustment of the South Fork Forked Deer River, west Tennessee. Environ. Geol. Water Sci 9, 109–118 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02449942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02449942

Keywords

Navigation