Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 14–19 | Cite as

A ‘Parallel process’? beginning a constructive conversation about a Mäori methodology

  • Fiona Cram
  • Hazel Phillips
  • Bevan Tipene-Matua
  • Murray Parsons
  • Katrina Taupo
Article

Abstract

This paper documents the beginning of a conversation about what it means to be Mäori within a larger, mainstream research project. This larger project was conceived by a team of researchers that included a Mäori principal investigator, and funding was gained from a funding agency that has established criteria for Mäori responsiveness. The Mäori component of the project was, however, not initially conceived of as separate from the non-Mäori component. Discussions about this were initiated approximately one year into the project in response to Mäori team members' desires to undertake Kaupapa Mäori research. This effectively means that the Mäori team colects and analyses the Mäori research data prior to re-engaging with the full research team. While there is a level of uncertainty about how this process will play itself out, there is a commitment to continue a constructive conversation within the team and to journey together in good faith and trust.

Key Words

Kaupapa Mäori research parallel research processes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cram F, Pihama L, Philip-Barbara G. Mäori and genetic engineering. Tamaki Makaurau: IRI Publications; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greensill A. Genetic engineering — Mäori views and values. Pacific World 1999 Oct:25–28.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cram F. Gackground Mäori views on genetic engineering. In: Barker J, editor, Sovereignty: Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska Press, in press 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mead ATeP. Misappropriation of indigenous knowledge: The next wave of colonisation. In: Nga tikanga, nga taonga. Cultural and intellectual property — The rights of indigenous peoples. University of Auckland: RUME; 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith I. Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books et Dunedin: Otago University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cram F. in collaboration with Henare M, Hunt T, Mauger J, Pahiri D, Pitama S, Tuuta C Mäori and science — Three case studies. A report prepared for the Royal Society of New Zealand. Tamaki Makaurau: IRI Publications; 2002. [cited 2004 Oct 12]. Available from:Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirby M. [homepage on the Internet]. Global approach to genetic enquiry is essential. Canberra: High Court of Australia; no date. [cited 2004 26 June]. Available from: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj-genetics.htm.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Netlink. Panama: Indigenous people raise alarms about… [press release on the Internet]. Netlink; 1997 Oct 12. [cited 2004 26 Jun]. Available from: http://www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/971219b.htm.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greensill A. Statement of Evidence of Angeline Greensill in the matter of Application for Approval to Field Test in Containment any Genetically Modified Organism, by AgResearch.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harry D. Biopiracy and globalization: Indigeneous peoples face a new wave of colonialism. Splice 2001. Jan/April 7 2et3. [cited 2004 June 10]. Available from: http://www.ipcb.org/publications/other_art/index.html.urlGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shelton BL. Consent and consultation in genetic research on American Indians and Alaska Natives. [briefing paper on the Internet]. Nixon (NV): Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism; no date. [cited 2004 Apr 15]. Available at. http://www.ipcb.org/publications/briefing_papers/files/consent.html.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graham A, McDonald J. Ethical principles for the conduct of research in the North. [monograph on the Internet]. Yukon College: Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies; 1997 [cited 2002 16 Sept] Available from:Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Health Research Council. Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Mäori. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Humphery K. Setting the rules: The development of the NHmrc guidelines on ethical matters in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. N Z Bioethics J. 2003 Feb;4(1):14–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Te Awekotuku N. He tikanga whakaaro: Research ethics in the Mäori community. Wellington: Manatu Mäori; 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cram F. Developing partnerships in research: Mäori research and Pakeha researchers. SITES 1997;35:44–63.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dewes K. Mäori education. In: Report of the Young Mäori Leaders Conference. Department of University Extension, The University of Auckland; 1968.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cram F. Rangahau Mäori: Tona tika, tona pono. In: Tolich M, editor. Research ethics in Aotearoa. Auckland: Longman; 2001. p. 35–52.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bishop R. Addressing issues in self-determination and legitimation in Kaupapa Mäori research. In: Webber B, compiler. He paipai körero. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research; 1996. p. 152–165.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pihama L, Cram F, Walker S. Creating methodological space: A literature review of Kaupapa Mäori research. Can J Native Educ. 2002;26:30–43.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jackson M. Mäori health research and Te Tiriti o Waitangi. In: Hui Whakapiripiri: A hui to discuss strategic directions for Mäori health research. Wellington School of Medicine: Te Röpü Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pömare; 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization. Toward a comprehensive approach to health guidelines for research with Indigenous Peoples. Report of the Working Group on Research, November 29–December 1, 1995. Washington, DC: Division of Health Systems and Services Development World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization; 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lather P. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge; 1991.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    hooks b. Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism. Cambridge (MA): South End Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cajete G. Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Sante Fe: Clear Light; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pihama LE. Tungia te ururua, kia tupu whakaritorito te tepu o te harakeke. MA thesis, The University of Auckland; 1993.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith GH. The development of Kaupapa Mäori theory and praxis. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Auckland; 1997.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simon J, Smith LT with Cram F, Höhepa M, McNaughton S, Stephenson M. A civilising mission? Perceptions and representations of the Native Schools system. Auckland: Auckland University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cram F, Smith L, Johnstone W. Mapping the themes of Mäori talk about health. N Z Med J. 2003 Mar 14;116(1170).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCreanor T, Nairn R. (2002). Tauiwi general practitioners'talk about Mäori health: interpretative repertoires. N Z Medical J. 2002 Dec 13;115(1167).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Cram
    • 1
  • Hazel Phillips
    • 2
  • Bevan Tipene-Matua
    • 2
  • Murray Parsons
  • Katrina Taupo
    • 3
  1. 1.Katoa LtdWellingtonCanterburyNew Zealand
  2. 2.Canterbury Polytechnic Institute of TechnologyCanterburyNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of CanterburyCanterburyNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations