Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of multiple coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in blood cultures using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the criteria used to determine the clinical importance of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CMS) is the isolation of the bacteria from sequential blood cultures. Sequential isolates of CNS obtained from five immunocompromised patients over three months were genetically characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). This typing method was compared to two first-line typing methods: determination of the species and of antibiotic susceptibility. In four patients the initial clinical evaluation changed because of the PFGE results; several episodes of bacteremia would have been wrongly assessed if only the biotype and the antibiotype had been determined. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis should therefore be used for CNS strains from immunocompromised patients or those suffering from chronic diseases with non-concordant biotype and antibiotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stillman RI, Wenzel RP, Donowitz LC: Emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci as major nosocomial bloodstream pathogens. Infection Control 1987, 8: 108–112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfaller MA, Herwaldt LA: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1988, 1: 281–299.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters G, Schumacher-Perdreau F, Pulverer G: Infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci in immunocompromised patients. Infection and Immunity 1986, 14: 165–169.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baltimore RS: Is it real or is it a contaminant? A guide to the interpretation of blood culture results. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1987, 141: 241–242.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dryden MS, Talsania HG, Martin S, Cunningham M, Richardson JF, Cookson B, Marples RR, Phillips I: Evaluation of methods for typing coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1992, 37: 109–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goering RV: Molecular epidemiology of nosocomial infection: analysis of chromosomal restriction fragment patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1993, 14: 595–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vandenesch F, Lina B, Lebeau C, Greenland TB, Etienne J: Epidemiological markers of coagulase negative staphylococci. Intensive Care Medicine 1993, 19: 311–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haertl R, Brandlow G: Genotyping ofStaphylococcus epidermidis by small-fragment restriction endonuclease analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments. Microbiology and Immunology 1994, 38: 527–534.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huebner J, Pier GB, Maslow JN, Muller E, Shiro H, Parent M, Kropec A, Arbeit RD, Goldman DA: Endemic nosocomial transmission ofStaphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia isolates in a neonatal intensive care unit over 10 years. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1994, 169: 526–531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Linhardt F, Ziebuhr W, Meyer P, Witte W, Hacker J: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments as a tool for the epidemiological analysis ofStaphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1992, 74: 181–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Approved standard. M100-S4. NCCLS, Villanova, PA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsedfield gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2233–2239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arbeit RD, Slutsky A, Barber TW, Maslow JN, Niemczyk S, Falkinham JO III, O'Connor GT, von Reyn CF: Genetic diversity among strains ofMycobacterium avium causing monoclonal and polyclonal bacteremia in patients with AIDS. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993, 167: 1384–1390.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Renaud F, Freney J, Etienne J, Bes M, Brun Y, Barsotti O, Andre S, Fleurette J: Restriction endonuclease analysis ofStaphylococcus epidermidis DNA may be a useful epidemiological marker. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 1729–1734.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khatib R, Riederer KM, Clark JA, Khatib S, Laurence E, Francis MW: Coagulase-negative staphylococci in multiple blood cultures: strain relatedness and determination of same-strain bacteremia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 816–820

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toldos, C.M., Yagüe, G., Ortiz, G. et al. Assessment of multiple coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in blood cultures using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16, 581–586 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447920

Keywords

Navigation