This article discusses the relevance of recent developments in neurobiology for the study of art worldwide. It is argued that both anthropologists and art historians can gain a better understanding of species-specific art and art practices over time and space by broadening their vision and approaches, building on the fundamental and exciting findings concerning art in neurobiology.
Keywordsart neurobiology anthropology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Damasio A.R., 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
- Dissanayake E., 1988. What is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- —, 1992. Homo Aestheticus. Where Art Comes From and Why. New York: The Free e Press.Google Scholar
- —, 2000. Art and Intimacy. How the Arts Began. Seattle: University of Washington n Press.Google Scholar
- Goguen J.A., 1999. Art and the Brain. Special issue of the Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6/7).Google Scholar
- Goguen J.A. and Myin E. (eds), 2000. Art and the Brain, Part II. Special issue of the Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(8/9).Google Scholar
- Ledoux J., 1986. Sensory systems and emotion. Integrative Psychiatry 4.Google Scholar
- LeDoux J., 1992. Emotions and the limbic system concept. Concepts in Neuroscience 2.2.Google Scholar
- Onians J. (ed.), forthcoming. Atlas of World Art.Google Scholar
- Ramachandran V.S. and Hirstein W., 1999. The science of art, a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6/7): 15–51.Google Scholar
- Segall M.H., Campbell D.T. and Herskovits M.J., 1966. The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
- Zeki S., 1999a. Art and the brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6/7).Google Scholar
- —, 1999b. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar