Advertisement

International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 219–230 | Cite as

High art as tourist art, tourist art as high art: Comparing the New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University and Sepik River tourist art

  • Silverman Eric K. 
Article

Abstract

This paper compares two contemporary aesthetic expressions: tourist art from the Sepik River in Papua New Guinea and the New Guinea Sculpture Garden at Stanford University. Both aesthetic expressions undermine the conventional categories that classify art. Sepik River tourist art is motivated not by the drive to lend individual, subjective experience a material expression but by monetary desire. The New Guinea Sculpture Garden was expressly created so that Sepik artisans could expand beyond the confines of village traditions and create unfettered aesthetic expressions. But seemingly inauthentic Tourist Art actually represents many of the ideals normally ascribed to Western masterpieces, or High Art. Conversely, the High Art of the Sculpture Garden in many respects resembles inauthentic reproductions and the tenacity of traditional forms. Both tourist art and the sculpture Garden, however, have one key quality in common: they rupture conventional artistic cattegories.

Keywords

tourism art Sepik River New Guinea Sculpture Garden 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames M.M., 1992. Cannibal Tours and Glass Boxes: The Anthropology of Museums. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clifford J., 1988. On Collecting Art and Culture. In: The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art, pp. 215–51. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  3. —. 1991. Four Northwest Coast Museums. In: Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, eds I. Karp and D. Lavine, pp. 212–54. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  4. —. 1997a. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1997b. Museums as Contact Zones. In: Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late te Twentieth Century, pp. 188–219. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Errington S., 1994. What Became Authentic Primitive Art? Cultural Anthropology 9: 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hangai D., 1996. Sculpture Garden Artists to Return for Opening. The Stanford Daily, May 28, 1996. (http://www.daily.stanford.org/5-28-96/NEWS/NEWsculpture28.html)Google Scholar
  8. Hayde M., 1996. “Garden of Delights.”Palo Alto Weekly, May 24, 1996. (http://www.service.com/paw/morgue/cover/1996_May_24. ARTS24.html)Google Scholar
  9. Hayward P., 1991. A New Tradition: Titus Tilly and the Development of Music Video in Papua New Guinea. Perfect Beat 2: 1–19.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, A.W. and Price-Williams D., 1996. Oedipus Ubiquitous: The Family Complex in World Folk Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jules-Rosette B., 1986. Aesthetics and Market Demand: The Structure of the Tourist Art Market in Three African Settings. African Studies Review 29: 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasfir S.L., 1992. African Art and Authenticity: A Text with A Shadow. African Arts 25:40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead M., 1938. The Mountain Arapesh. I. An Importing Culture. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 36:139–349.Google Scholar
  14. —, 1978. The Sepik as a Cultural Area: Comment. Anthropologicalcal Quarterly 51:69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leccese M., 1994. Carving the Garden. Landscape Architecture 84: 20.Google Scholar
  16. Pratt M.L., 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Price S., 1989. Primitive Art in Civilized Places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Quinones C., 1997. Backyard Art: Sculpture on The Farm. The Stanford Daily, September 25, 1997. (daily97%2D98/intermission/int9%2D25%2D97/features/index.html)Google Scholar
  19. Rony, Fatimah Tobing, 1996. The Third Eye: Race, Cinema, and Ethnographic Spectacle. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Root D., 1996. Cannibal Culture: Art, Appropriation, & the Commodification of Difference, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  21. Silver H.R., 1979. Beauty and the “I” of the Beholder: Identity, Aesthetics, and Social Change among the Ashanti. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:191–207.Google Scholar
  22. Silverman E.K., 1999. Art, Tourism and the Crafting of Identity in the Sepik River (Papua New Guinea). In: Unpacking Culture: Art and Commodity in Colonial and Postcolonial Worlds, eds R. Phillips and C. Steiner, pp. 51–66. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Silverman E.K., 2000. Tourism in the Sepik River of Papua New Guinea: Favoring the Local over the Global. In: Local Perspectives on Global Tourism in South East Asia and the Pacific Region, eds. H. Dahles and T. van Meijl, Special Issue of Pacific Tourism Review 4:105–19.Google Scholar
  24. —, 2001a. From Totemic Space to Cyberspace: Transformations in Sepik River and Aboriginal I Australian Myth, Knowledge and Art. In: Emplaced Myth: Space, Narrative and Knowledge in Aboriginal Australia and Papua New Guinea Societies, eds. J. Weiner and A. Rumsey, pp. 189–214. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  25. —, 2001b. Masculinity, Motherhood, and Mockery: Psychoanalyzing Culture and the Iatmul 1 Naven Rite in New Guinea. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. —, 2004. Cannibalizing, Commodifying, and Creating Culture: Power and Creativity in Sepik River Tourism. In: Globalization and Culture Change in the Pacific Islands, ed. V. Lockwood. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Steiner C.B., 1994. African Art in Transit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Steinmetz JA., 1994. New Guinea Carvers Bring Art to Campus. San Jose Mercury News, June 6, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Torgovnick M., 1990. Gone Primitive: Savage Intellects, Modern Lives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silverman Eric K. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology/AnthropologyDePauw UniversityGreencastleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations