Determinants of family size in rural Glacia (Spain)
- 1 Downloads
The determinants of complete family size and offspring survival were assessed by means of family reconstitution data from a 19th & 20th century rural population of Northwest Spain.
The reproductive performances of families were submitted to a stepwise regression analysis in which the number of children born alive and those surviving to reproductive age per family were taken as dependent variables, while 13 other variables were defined as independent. Infant mortality appears to explain most fertility variation; an earlier marital age and at first maternity leads to an increased family size. Survival seems to be the result of the apposite interaction of both fertility and mortality in early childhood.
Key wordsFamily reconstitution Fertility Survival
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bumpass L.L. and Mburugu E.K. 1977.Age at marriage and complete family size. Social Biology, 24: 31–37.Google Scholar
- Chang H.C., Warren R.D. and Pendleton B.F. 1979.Testing and clarifying a macromodel of socioeconomic change and fertility. Social Biology, 26: 30–50.Google Scholar
- Frisancho A.R., Klayman J.E. and Matos J. 1976.Symbiotic relationship high fertility high childhood mortality and socioeconomic status in an urban Peruvian population. Human Biology, 48: 101–111.Google Scholar
- Fuster V. 1982.Estructura antropogenética de la población de nueve parroquias del municipio de Los Nogales, Lugo (1871–1977). Ph.D. Thesis. Madrid. Editorial de la Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar
- Fuster V. 1985.Extramarital reproduction and family size in a Spanish rural community. DYN The Journal of the Durham Anthropological Society. (In Press).Google Scholar
- Heer D.M. and Boynton J.W. 1970.A multivariate regression analysis of differences in fertility of United States counties. Social Biology, 17: 180–194.Google Scholar
- Saksena D.N. and Srivastava J.N. 1980.Biosocial correlates of perinatal mortality: experiences of an Indian hospital. Journal of Biosocial Science, 12: 69–81.Google Scholar