Advertisement

International Journal of Anthropology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 81–87 | Cite as

Nonmetric cranial variation and biological distances between samples of six nontribal populations of India

  • R. K. Pathak
  • S. S. Kaul
Article

Abstract

Sixty-nine nonmetrical morphological variants of the cranium have been studied in six samples of non-tribal, state populations in India, and their incidence reported. Using C.A.B. Smith’s angular transformation of frequencies, the multivariate Thetasquare distances and their respective standard deviations have been presented. On the basis of nonmetrical cranial variation, it is clear that the samples from Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Bihar are closer to each other but distant from Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra. On the other hand, Karnataka and Maharashtra samples are quite close to each other and both, in turn, are comparatively closer to Madhya Pradesh than to Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Bihar. Madhya Pradesh sample emerges as the most divergent group among the six population samples studied. This, in general, is in conformity with the picture that emerges from various analysis of morphometric and other biological data on various populations of India.

Key words

nonmetric cranial traits population distance India 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja U.K., Mukherjee R.N. &Singh B., 1971.Pterion: its formation and variation. J. Anat. Soc. India., 20: 103–111.Google Scholar
  2. Anand V., 1975.Discrete Nonmetric Variation in the Human Skull (Indian Material). M. Sc. (Hons. Scool) Dissertation, Panjab University: Chandigarh.Google Scholar
  3. Ardito G., 1977.The epigenetic variants of the skulls in some ancient and recent Italian populations. J. Hum. Evol., 6: 689–695.Google Scholar
  4. Berry A.C. &Berry R.J., 1967.Epigenetic variation in the human cranium. J. Anat., 101: 361–379.Google Scholar
  5. Bowles G. T., 1977.The People of Asia. Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London.Google Scholar
  6. Corruccini R.S., 1974.An examination of the meaning of cranial discrete traits for human skeletal biological studies. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 40: 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das A.C., Saxena R.C. &Beg M.A.Q., 1973.Incidence of metopic suture in U.P. subjects. J. Anat. Soc. India., 22: 140.Google Scholar
  8. Dixit C.S. &Shukla P.L., 1968.Metopic suture in human crania. J. Anat. Soc. India., 17: 47.Google Scholar
  9. Dodo Y., 1974.Non-metrical cranial traits in the Hokkaido Ainu and the Northern Japanese of recent times. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon., 82: 31–51.Google Scholar
  10. Inderjit &Shah M.A., 1948. Incidence of frontal or metopic suture amongst Punjabi adults. Ind. Med. Gazette., 83: 507–508.Google Scholar
  11. Kaul S., Anand V. &Corruccini R.S., 1979.Nonmetric variation of the human skull in samples of four Indian populations. J. Hum. Evol., 8: 693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kellock W.L. &Parsons P.A., 1970.Variation of minor non-metrical cranial variants in Australian Aborigines. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 32: 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishra K.K. &Lala J.K., 1969.Wormian bones giving erroneous impression of vault fracture. J. Ind. Med. Assoc., 52: 178–179.Google Scholar
  14. Mourant A.E., Kopec A.C. &Domaniewska-Sobczack Kazimiera, 1976.The Distribution of the Human Blood Groups and Other Polymorphisms. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
  15. Mouri T., 1976.A study of nonmetrical cranial variants of the modern Japanese in Kinki district. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 84: 191–203.Google Scholar
  16. Ossenberg N.S., 1976.Within and between race distances in population studies based on discrete traits of the human skull. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 33: 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rau R.K., 1934.Skull showing absence of coronal suture. J. Anat., London, 69: 109–112.Google Scholar
  18. Rosing F.W., 1984.Discrete of the human skeleton: a critical review. J. Hum. Evol., 13: 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sen D.K., 1971.A review of anthropometry in India. Bull. Anthrop. Survey of India, 20: 188–229.Google Scholar
  20. Sjovold T., 1973.Occurrence of minor nonmetric variants in the skeleton and their quantitative treatment for population comparisons. Homo, 24: 204–233.Google Scholar
  21. Srivastava R.P., Saran Gopala, Gai P.B., Hittalmani S.V., Auraradi S.A. &Umapathy B.E., 1979.Distribution of ABO blood groups in Karnataka. Curr. Anthrop., 20: 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Il Sedicesimo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Pathak
    • 1
  • S. S. Kaul
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations