Abstract
The supraorbital ridge formation in apes is a result of the traction of the masticatory force exerted by the anterior part of the temporalis muscle. This force varies inversely with the ratio of the power arm to the load arm of the mandible. The smaller this ratio, the greater the anterior part of the temporalis muscle and the larger the supraorbital ridge. The size of the ridge is independent of the actual size of the skull. The orang has a larger skull but the smallest brow ridge of the three species studied: gorilla, chimpanzee and orang. Pearson’s correlation coefficient shows a positive correlation between the anterior temporalis muscle and the ridge as well as between the ridge/sinus and anterior/whole temporalis muscle. The correlation is negative between the power/load arms and anterior/whole muscle and also between the power/load arms and the ridge/sinus ratio.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duterloo H. S. &Enlow D. H., 1970.A comparative study of cranial growth in Homo and Macaca. American Journal of Anatomy, 127: 357–367.
Ehara A. &Seiler R., 1970.Die struckturen der uberaugen region beiden primaten, deutungen und deffinitionen. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie, 62: 1–29.
Endo, B., 1965.Distribution of stress and strain produced in the human facial skeleton by masticatory force. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, 73: 123–136.
Endo B., 1966.Experimental studies on the mechanical significance of the form of the human facial skeleton. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section V, Anthropology, 3: 1–106.
Endo B., 1973.Stresses analysis on the facial skeleton of Gorilla by means of the wire strain gauge method. Primates, 14: 37–45.
Enlow D. H. &McNamara R., 1973.The neurocranial basis for facial form and pattern. Angle Orthodontist, 43: 256–270.
Gingerich P. D., 1979.The human mandible: lever, link, or both? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51: 135–138.
Hylander W. L., 1975.The human mandible: lever or link? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 43: 227–242.
Moss M. L. &Young R. W., 1960.A functional approach to craniology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 18: 281–292.
Oyen O. J., Rice R. W. &Cannon S. M., 1979.Browridge structure and function in extant primates and Neanderthals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51: 83–96.
Oyen O. J., Walker A. C. &Rice R. W., 1979.Craniofacial growth in olive baboons (P. anubis): browridge formation. Growth, 43: 174–187.
Pauwels F., 1980.Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus. Trans. Maquet, P. & Furlong, R. Springer-Verlag.
Smith F. H. &Ranyard G. C., 1980.Evolution of the Supraorbital region in Upper Pleistocene hominids from south-central Europe. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53: 589–610.
Tappen N. C., 1973.Structure of bone in the skulls of Neanderthal fossils. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38: 93–98.
Tappen N. C., 1978.The vermiculate surface pattern of browridges in Neanderthal and modern crania. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 49: 1–10.
Weidenreich F., 1941.The brain and its role in the phylogenetic transformation of the human skull. Transaction of the American Zoological Society (U.S.), 31: 321–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilloowala, R.A., Trent, R.B. Supraorbital ridge and masticatory apparatus I: Primates. Hum. Evol. 3, 343–350 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447216
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447216