Advertisement

Human Evolution

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 335–342 | Cite as

Two Methods for reconstructing the empirical mortality profile

  • J. L. Boldsen
Article

Abstract

This paper goes one step beyond the age determination of the individual skeleton. It presents two methods for the reconstruction of the distribution of the age at death in a sample of skeletons. It is shown that the maximum likelihood method, in spite of certain weaknesses, is superior to the traditionally used proportional method, especially in situations when the analyzed sample consists of skeletons with very different conditions of preservation and thus age intervals of differing lengths. The maximum likelihood method eliminates a bias towards increased average age at death which is introduced by the proportional method. An analysis of an empirical example indicates that the difference between results obtained using the two methods increases with increasing age.

Key words

Distribution of age at death maximum likelihood estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennike P., 1985.Palaeopathology of Danish Skeletons: A Comparative Study of Demography. Disease and Injury. København, Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  2. Boldsen J.L., 1984.Problems in the reconstruction of vital statistics in past populations. Symposium i anvendt statistik 1984, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  3. Boldsen J.L., 1987.Population structure and height in history. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. Boldsen J.L. &Jeune B., 1985.Alderen for menopausens indtræden. Ugeskrift for læger, 147: 3641–3642.Google Scholar
  5. Ferembach M., Schwidetzky I. &Stloukal M., 1980.Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeletons. J. Hum. Evol., 9: 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helm S. &Prydsø U., 1979.Assessment of age at death from mandibular molar attrition in medieval Danes. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 87: 79–90.Google Scholar
  7. Kieffer-Olsen J., Boldsen J.L. &Pentz P., 1986.En nyfundet kirke ved Bygholm. Vejle amts årbog, 1986, 24–51.Google Scholar
  8. Lassen A., 1965.Fald of fremgang. Træk af befolkningsudviklingen i Danmark 1645–1960. Aarhus. Jysk historisk selskab.Google Scholar
  9. Mascie-Taylor C.G.N. &Boldsen J.L., 1986.Reecalled age at menarche in Britain. Ann. Hum. Biol., 13: 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Møller-Christensen V., 1958.Bogen om Æbelholt Kloster. København. Dansk videnskabs Forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Turnbull B.W., 1976.The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J. Royal Statistical Society B, 39: 290–295.Google Scholar
  12. Ubelaker D.H., 1974.Reconstruction of Demographic profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, no. 18, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Welinder S., 1979.Prehistoric Demography. Acta Archaeol Lundensia, ser. 8, Minore 80, Lund.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Il Sedicesimo 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Boldsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Community HealthDepartment of Social Medicine University of OdenseOdense CDenmark

Personalised recommendations