Advertisement

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp HTA11–HTA15 | Cite as

Assessment of medical technology: The role of engineers

  • J. Hutton
Special Feature: Healthcare Technology Assessment

Abstract

Assessment of medical technologies is a multidisciplinary activity requiring the participation of engineers, clinicians and social scientists. The contribution of engineers has often been confined to the early stages of technical assessment. However, engineers have important inputs to make throughout the assessment process in their roles of developers, users and managers of technology. Engineers have found collaboration with clinical researchers possible through hospital-based work, but must also develop links with economists and other social scientists if they are to make a full contribution to comprehensive technology assessment.

Keywords

Acquisition Biomedical engineers Cost-effectiveness Medical equipment Medical technology assessment Research 

References

  1. Buxton, M. J. (1987) Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: the evaluation of heart transplants in the UK. InEconomic appraisal of health technology in the European Community.Drummond, M. F. (Ed.), Oxford, Oxford Medical Publications, 103–118.Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, I. (1990) Under-reporting research is scientific misconduct.J. Am. Med. Assoc.,263, 1405–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, L. S., Chalmers, T. C., McNally, M., Berner, J. andSacks, H. S. (1988) The poor quality of early evaluations of magnetic resonance imaging. ——Ibid.,259, 3277–3280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Health (1988) Option appraisal for medical equipment, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  5. Drummond, M. F. andHutton J. (1987) Economic appraisal of technology in the UK. InEconomic appraisal of health technology in the European Community.Drummond, M. F. (Ed.), Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford, 239–262.Google Scholar
  6. Drummond, M. F. (1991) Australian guidelines for cost-effectiveness studies of pharmaceuticals: the thin end of the boomerang. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper No. 88, University of York, York.Google Scholar
  7. Fineberg, H. V., Baumon, R. andSosmon, M. (1977) Computerised cranial tomography, effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans.J. Am. Med. Assoc.,238, 224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hillman, A. L., Eisenberg, J. M., Pauly, H. V., Bloom, B. S., Glick, H., Kinosian, B. andSchwartz, J. S. (1991) Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.New Engl. J. Med.,324, 1362–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hutton, J., Fagnani, F., Jorgensen, T., Persson, J. andSaranummi, N. (1991) AIM project ASSIST: final report to commission of EC. University of York.Google Scholar
  10. Hutton, J., Fagnani, F., Jorgensen, T., Persson, J. andSaranummi, N. (1992) ASSIST: assessment of information systems and technologies in health care. InAdvances in medical informatics.van Goor, J. N. andChristensen, J. P. (Eds.) IOS Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Jonsson, E. andReiser, S. (1985) Editors' introduction.Int. J. Technol. Assess in Health Care,1, 1–2.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menon, D. (1993) Technology assessment and biomedical engineering education.med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput.,31, HTA33-HTA36.Google Scholar
  13. Peckham, M. (1991) Research and development for the NHS.Lancet,338, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. University of Leeds, University of York, Royal College of Physicians and Department of Health (1992) Effective Health Care No. 1, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, A. H. (1983) The role of economics in the evaluation of health care technologies. InEconomic and medical evaluation of health technologies.Culyer, A. J. andHorisberger, B. (Eds.), Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Hutton
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Health EconomicsUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations