Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the immunomodulating effect of met-enkephalin: Role of mitogen dose, stage of cell activation, and time of opioid administration

  • Microbiology and Immunology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Met-enkephalin in a concentration range of 10−15 to 10−9 M exhibited an immunomodulating effect upon concanavalin A-induced proliferation of mouse lymphocytesin vitro. The effect of met-enkephalin was shown to depend on the stage of lymphocyte activation, the time of opioid administration, and the dose of mitogen. Met-enkephalin produced the maximal effect when given in the phases of increase or decrease of the proliferative response. Met-enkephalin augmented the proliferative response to the suboptimal dose of concanavalin A and, on the contrary, inhibited the response to the optimal dose of mitogen. Administration of met-enkephalin at different times could both inhibit and stimulate proliferation depending on the stage of lymphocyte activation. An inhibitory effect was induced by δ-class opioid ligand, while κ-ligand was responsible for stimulation. Naloxone abolished the stimulating effect of opioids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Zozulya and S. F. Pshenichkin,Advances in Science and Technology, Immunology [in Russian], Vol. 25, Moscow (1990), p. 48.

  2. L. A. Khegai, B. B. Kim, E. M. Gavrilova,et al., Biokhimiya,57, 1664 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Barreca, G. Di Benedetto, G. Corsini,et al., Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol.,9, 467 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Bidlack, L. D. Sairpalli, D. M. P. Lawrence, and D. B. Joseph,Adv. Biosci.,86, 585 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. J. J. Carr, B. R. DeCosta, C.-H. Kim,et al., J. Endocrinol.,122, 161 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Fiorica and S. Spector,Life Sci.,42, 199 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Gilmore and L. P. Weiner,J. Neuroimmunol.,18, 125 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Malfroy, J. P. Swerts, A. Guyon,et al., Nature,276, 523 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. C. Norman, J. E. Morley, and M.-P. Chang,Mech. Aging Develop.,44, 185 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Puppo, G. Corsini, P. Mangini,et al., Immunopharmacology,10, 119 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Roscetti, C. M. Ausielo, C. Palma,et al., Int. J. Immunopharmacol.,10, 819 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. X. Yang and X. Y. Li,,10, 25 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Wybran,Fed. Proc.,44, 92 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. V. Zaitsev, L. A. Khegai, B. B. Kim,et al., Immunol. Lett.,32, 27 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Zuravski, M. Benedik, B. J. Kamp,et al., Science,232, 772 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated fromByulleten' Eksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 119, No 4, pp. 398–401, April, 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubinin, K.V., Zakharova, L.A. Factors influencing the immunomodulating effect of met-enkephalin: Role of mitogen dose, stage of cell activation, and time of opioid administration. Bull Exp Biol Med 119, 385–389 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02445900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02445900

Key Words

Navigation