Skip to main content
Log in

Condition of potentially unstable rock masses in the left-bank slope during construction and operation of the Sayano-Shushenskoe hydroelectric power plant

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    In connection with the fact that potentially unstable masses exist in the immediate vicinity of the dam and powerhouse, which are referred to as Class I structures in terms of capital expenditures, the approach taken for the design of PUM stabilization should be nonstandard with consideration given to a number of permanent vibratory design loads introiduced by operating hydraulic units and spillways, as well cyclically varying loads due to the weight of the water in the reservoir and the weight of the structures.

  2. 2.

    It is proposed to define the volumes required for PUM stabilization of the left-bank slope more precisely on the basis of observations of PUM during construction and operation of the hydroelectric plant. The interruptions that have occurred in the instrument observations should therefore be recognized as impermissible.

  3. 3.

    Construction and operating experience has demonstrated that it is expedient to perform work on stabilization of potentially unstable masses prior to the start of construction on entities located in their immediate vicinity.

  4. 4.

    A protective rock wall built at the foot of the slope cannot provide for the complete safety of the structures located close to the left-bank slope during the collapse of rock blocks or individual stones.

  5. 5.

    On-going monitoring of the condition of the left-bank slope does not correspond completely to problems of providing for the safety of the structures and personnel at the hydroelectric plant by reason of the low reliability of the measuring equipment.

  6. 6.

    Use of the automated “Relos-L” system for observations of the condition of the rock masses will make it possible to carry out continuous on-going monitoring within the framework of the automated production-control system at the Sayano-Shushenskoe hydroelectric plant. Only a multifunctional monitoring system, which includes different kinds of independent observations, can provide a sufficiently valid evaluation of the state of the PUM, and, on their basis, determine measures to prevent possible emergency situations.

  7. 7.

    The collapse of PUM in the initial stage of construction with subsequent plaining of the slope and the organization of multistory rock-entrapping benches is a more reliable, safe, and, probably, economical (if expenditures for future operation are assumed in the calculation) method than their stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Sayano-Shushenskoe Hydroelectric Power Plant on the Yenisei River: A Review of Engineering-Geological Documentation of the Rock Bed of the Gravity-Arch Dam, Toe Basin, and Powerhouse (according to studies conducted from 1969 through 1985) [in Russian], Inventory No. 1047-3-55t, Gidroproekt, Leningradskoe Otdelenie, (1986).

  2. The Sayano-Shushenskoe Hydroelectric Power Plant on the Yenisei River: Results of Investigation of Potentially Unstable Block 8-II and the Left-Bank Slope in the Section from the Dam to Pass No. 5 after the Earthquake of 14 March 1995 [in Russian], Inventory No. 1047-14-74, Lengidroproekt, (1994).

  3. The Sayano-Shushenskoe Hydroelectric Power Plant on the Yenisei River: A Conclusion Concerning the Geologic-Engineering Conditions of the Rock Embankment-Slope Between the Downstream Face of the Left-Bank Dam and Potentially Unstable Mass No. 4 [in Russian], Inventory No. 1047-14-73 t, Lengidroproekt, (1992).

  4. V. N. Zhivoderov, “Stabilization of a potentially unstable rock mass during construction of the Sayano-Shushenskoe hydroelectric plant,”Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 1, (1992).

  5. B. Tomov, A. Evstafiev, I. Beshevliev, and A. Dilov,Injected Stressed Anchors [in Russian], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Ternavskii, V. N. Zhukov, Yu. O. Zal'tsman, and A. A. Lyubomirov, “Strengthening the walls of sluice No. 8 of the Moscow Canal with prestressed anchors,”Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 11, (1996).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 9, pp. 67–71, September, 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryzgalov, V.I., Shatravskii, A.I., Permyakova, L.S. et al. Condition of potentially unstable rock masses in the left-bank slope during construction and operation of the Sayano-Shushenskoe hydroelectric power plant. Hydrotechnical Construction 32, 550–555 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02443676

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02443676

Keywords

Navigation