Skip to main content
Log in

Biophysical profiling of hydraulic structures

  • Nontraditional Survey Methods in Hydrotechnical Construction
  • From the Editor
  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The use of biolocation on the given examples of power facilities being constructed and operated substantially help solving engineering-geological problems, which indictes its rather high practical value in the area of hydrotechnical construction.

  2. 2.

    To increase the accuracy when determining the boundaries of anomalous zones and to eliminate the subjective factor, it is necessary to correlate the method in a qualitative and quantitative respect, which will make it possible to objectively establish the limits of use of biophysical profiling in hydrotechnical construction.

  3. 3.

    Biolocation makes it possible to detect and establish the boundaries of anomalies of geopathogenic zones — channels of vertical circulation of geoenergy in the earth—outer space system, the companions of which are detectable new formations in the soil mass of a natural foundation or artificial earth structures, which gives grounds to consider geopathogenic zones to be objectively existing phenomena of nature, the physical essence of the energetic processes in which is little-studied.

  4. 4.

    Geopathogenic zones are not something static but are quite dynamic systems characterized by phenomena of hyperpolarization, explosion, thermal shock, and temporal fluctuations of the intensity and parameters of georadiations, which causes modification and fracturing of the soil mass of foundations of structures and produces inhomogeneities in artificial earth structures, which are undesirable in hydrotechnical construction.

  5. 5.

    The foregoing indicates the urgent need for a systematic study of channels of vertical circulation of geoenergy, which will make it possible to considerably increase the reliability and environmental safety of hydraulic and other power structures and embankments of slime storages, ash dumps, tailings storages of concentration plants.

  6. 6.

    When investigating archaeological objects of flood zones of reservoirs biolocation is quite promising as a nondestructive method of studying archaeological memorials, since it permits establishing areas of top-priority digs and considerably reduces the cost of archaeological surveys on territories being flooded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. V. A. Boltunov, “Some signs distinguishing morainal glacial and moraine-like glaciomarine deposits (for the example of Spitzbergen),” Vestnik MGU, Ser. Geol., No. 4 (1969).

  2. V. A. Boltunov, “Characteristics of the formation of the physical and mechanical properties of coastal deposits of Spitzbergen,” in: Civil Engineering Surveys [in Russian], Moscow (1975).

  3. V. A. Boltunov, “Characteristics of physical fields of the shelf and facies analysis in engineering-geological surveys,” in: Proceedings of the 36th Scientific-Technical Conference of the V. V. Kuibyshev Moscow Civil Engineering Institute [in Russian], Moscow (1978).

  4. V. A. Boltunov, “Little-studied forms of action of natural atmospheric electrical discharges on soils and earth structures of power facilities (with special reference to the Dnestr PSS). Proceedings of the All-Russian conference “Long-lived plasma formations and little-studied forms of natural electrical discharges in the atmosphere,” Teplofiz. Vys. Temp., No. 1 (1993).

  5. V. A. Boltunov, “Use of biophysical profiling during surveys and construction of the Dnestr multipurpose hydro development,” in: Proceedings of the First International (Eleventh) Conference of Surveyors of Gidroproekt [in Russian], Solnechnogorsk March 15–18, 1993.

  6. V. A. Boltunov, “Effect of atmospheric electricity (in geopathogenic zones) on soils and earth structures of hydro-power facilities,” in: Ibid. Proceedings of the First International (Eleventh) Conference of Surveyors of Gidroproekt [in Russian], Solnechnogorsk March 15–18, 1993.

  7. V. A. Boltunov “Biolocation as a method of inspecting hydraulic structures and their soil foundations,” Énerg. Stroit., No. 10 (1994).

  8. I. A. Nepomnyashchii, N. N. Sochevanov, and O. A. Isaeva, “Possibilities of biolocation in prospecting for mineral deposits,” Obzor VIEMS, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. West German Patent No. 2256680, NKN 42 c 45/00, IPC 01 U 9/00, “Device acting as a divining rod,” No. 2256680, 9–53. Appl. 18.11.87, Pubd. 12.12.87. Issued 14.09.75-5c [Russian translation].

  10. F. Still, Z. Reidak, J. Fderg, K. Hlubna, Czech Patent No. 238554, IPC 01/16, “Apparatus for finding and determining the location and form of geopathogenic zones and anomalies in solid and liquid media,” No. RU 8284. Appl. 28.11.80. Pubd. 15.05.85. Issued 01.12.87 [Russian translation].

  11. V. Bartel, West German Patent No. DE 373214 A, IPC 0.1 U 9/00, 07c 11/00 11 A.61 B 5/05, 08 B 13/18, “Biotelemetric receiver operating without a transmitter,” No. 373271. Appl. 29.09.87. Pubd. 27.04.89.

  12. V. A. Perepelitsin, Fundamentals of Technical Mineralogy and Petrography [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Ryka and A. Malishevskaya, Petrographic Dictionary [Russian translation], Nedra, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. N. Sochevanov and V. S. Matveev, “Electromagnetic fields as the cause of a biophysical effect,” in: Physicomathematical and Biological Problems of the Effect of Electromagnetic Fields and Ionization of Air [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow, Vol. 2 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. N. Sochevanov, V. S. Statsenko, and A. Ya. Chekunov, Use of the Biolocation Method in Prospecting and Geological Mapping [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 10, pp. 48–55, October, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boltunov, V.A. Biophysical profiling of hydraulic structures. Hydrotechnical Construction 29, 618–631 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02443054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02443054

Navigation