Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of different techniques for processing evoked potentials

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comaprison is made of three techniques for processing evoked potentials. These techniques are conventional signal averaging, crosscorrelation averaging and latency corrected averaging. Results obtained for 20 subjects are shown in the Appendix and the results for two of the subjects are analysed in detail.

Sommaire

Une comparaison est faite entre trois techniques de traitement des potentiels évoqués. Ces techniques sont le calcul de la moyenne de signaux conventionnels, de la moyenne de corrélations croisées et de moyennes corrigées en fonction de la latence. Les résultats obtenus sur vingt sujets sont indiqués en annexe et les résultats pour deux de ces sujets analysés détail.

Zusammenfassung

Es werden drei Verfahren zur Verarbeitung evozierter Potentiale verglichen. Bei diesen Verfahren handelt es sich um die Signal-Mittelbildung, die Kreuzkorrelations-Mittelbildung und die latenzkorrigierte Mittelbildung. Die bei 20 Versuchspersonen erhaltenen Ergebnisse werden im Anhang aufgeführt, und in zwei Fällen werden die Ergebnisse genau analysiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brazier, M. A. B. (1964) Evoked responses recorded from the depths of the human brain.112, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciganek, L. (1961) The EEG response (evoked potential) to light stimulus in man.Electroenceph. Clin. Neuroph. 13, 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciganek, L. (1969) Variability of the human visual evoked potential: normative data,27, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958) The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation,10, 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillem, C. D. andAunon, J. I. (1977) Measurements of signal components in single visually evoked brain response.IEEE Trans. BME-24, 232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody, C. R. (1967) Characterisation of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals.5, 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

    J. I. Aunon & R. W. Sencaj

Authors
  1. J. I. Aunon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. W. Sencaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aunon, J.I., Sencaj, R.W. Comparison of different techniques for processing evoked potentials. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 16, 642–650 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442443

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442443

Keywords

Search

Navigation