Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction of the constituent components of brain stem auditory evoked responses by a filtering and optimisation procedure

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cascaded filtering and optimisation procedure is used to break down the human brain stem auditory evoked respose into what are believed to be its basic constituent components. The three main components are a slow background wave, a repetitive wave and a delayed component Peaks I, II, III, IV and VI are identified with the crests of the repetitive wave. This suggests very strongly that they originate from a common generator source. Peak V is formed by the superposition of the delayed component on the repetitive wave. It is the most stable feature of the response. In addition to the main components the scalp-recorded response is inferred to have a smaller signal from the auditory nerve, the polarity of which depends on the location of the reference electrode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, P. F., Durrett, R., Pulec, J. L. andHartstone, J. L. (1979) A new parameter in brain stem auditory evoked responses—component wave areas.Laryngoscope,89, 1569–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barajas, J. J. (1982) Evaluation of ipsilateral and contralateral brainstem auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients.J. Neurol. Sci.,54, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappa, K. H., Gladstone, K. J. andYoung, R. R. (1979) Brain stem auditory evoked responses: studies of waveform variation in 50 normal human subjects.Arch. Neurol. (Chicago),36 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, I., Ishiyama, T., Yoshimoto, S. andNemoto, S. (1981) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials recorded directly from human brainstem and thalamus.Brain,104, 841–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. R., Fino, J. andGagnon, L. (1981) The importance of phase of stimulus and the reference recording electrode in brain stem auditory evoked potentials.Electroencephalogr. & Clin. Neurophysiol.,51, 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevanishvilli, Z. andLagidze, Z. (1979) Recovery function of the human brain stem auditory evoked potential.Audiology,18, 472–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A. R., Jannetta, P. J., Bennett, M. andMoller, M. B. (1981) Intracranially recorded responses from human auditory nerve: new insights into the origin of brain stem evoked potentials.Electroencephalogr. & Clin. Neurophysiol.,52, 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A. R. andJannetta, P. J. (1982) Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. —Ibid.,,52, 612–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. E. (1975) Effect of sound on the vestibular system. InInfrasound and low frequency vibrations,Tempest,W. (Ed.), Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picton, T. W., Hillyard, S. A., Krausz, H. I. andGalambos, R. (1974) Human auditory evoked potentials. 1: Evaluation of components.Electroencephalogr. & Clin. Neurophysiol.,36, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasher, D. K. andGibson, W. P. R. (1980) Brainstem auditory potentials. Significant latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation. —Ibid.,,50, 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. J. (1978) Normal variability of the brainstem evoked response in young and old adult subjects. —Ibid.,,44, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. L. andHarkins, S. W. (1978) Amplitude of the brainstem auditory evoked response: the effect of interstimulus intervals.Intern. J. Neuroscience,8, 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, A. andAchor, L. J. (1975) Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease.Arch. Neurol. (Chicago),32, 761–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockard, J. J., Stockard, J. E. andSharbrough, F. W. (1978) Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory evoked potentials.Am. J. EEG Technol.,18, 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockard, J. E., Stockard, J. J., Westmoreland, B. F. andCorfits, J. F. (1979) Normal variation of brainstem evoked potentials as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics.Arch. Neurol. (Chicago),36, 823–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkildsen, K., Osterhammel, P. andHuis In't Veld, P. (1973) Electrocochleography with a far field technique.Scand. Audiol.,2, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. R. D. andColeman, M. (1975) The adaptation of cochlear and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans.Electroencephalogr. & Clin. Neurophysiol.,39, 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. R. D. (1978) Interpretation of cochlear nerve and brain stem evoked responses. InEvoked electrical activity in the auditory nervous system,Naunton,R. F. andFernandez,C. (Eds.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, J.G. Extraction of the constituent components of brain stem auditory evoked responses by a filtering and optimisation procedure. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 22, 339–342 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442103

Keywords

Navigation