Method to evaluate the skill level in fast locomotion through myoelectric and kinetic signal analysis

  • V. Medved
  • S. Tonkovic
Biomechanics

Abstract

The paper describes a method aimed at providing objective diagnostic testing of skilled locomotor stereotypes. Bioelectric muscle activity indices and ground reaction force data are used to represent a movement structure, in a schematised way, using discrete states in time. Athletes were asked to perform one specific movement structure: a backward somersault from the standing position. Mathematical analyses of measured signals reveal the significance, for the skill level evaluation, of parameters reflecting the impulsive take-off force waveform and the symmetry in EMG activity of ankle extensor muscles, which therefore might be used as diagnostic criteria. Within technical limitations, this approach may also be applied to other locomotor patterns and possibly to monitor the progress in motorics in pathological locomotion. EMG telemetry could significantly enhance the method's scope.

Keywords

Biomechanics Computerised measurement Electromyography Locomotion diagnostics Motoric skill 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basmajian, J. V. (1967)Muscles alive—their function revealed by electromyography. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.Google Scholar
  2. Bekey, G. A., Chang, C., Perry, J. andHoffer, M. (1977) Pattern recognition of multiple EMG signals applied to the description of human gait.Proc. IEEE,65, 674–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosco, C. (1985) Stretch-shortening cycle in skeletal muscle function and physiological considerations on explosive power in man.Atleticastudi,1, 7–113.Google Scholar
  4. Bouisset, S. (1973) EMG and muscle force in normal motor activities. InNew developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology, Vol. 1,Desmedt,J. E. (Ed.). Karger, Basel, 547–583.Google Scholar
  5. Cavanagh, P. R. (1988) On ‘muscle action’ vs ‘muscle contraction’.J. Biomech.,21, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenna, P. andFrigo, C. (1985) Monitoring gait by a vector diagram technique in spastic patients. InClinical neurophysiology in spasticity.Delwaide, P. J. andYoung, R. R. (Eds.), Elsevier Science Publ., 109–124.Google Scholar
  7. Ekiel, J. (1984) Biocybernetic movement systems. InCybernetic systems of limb movements in man, animals and robots.Morecki, A., Ekiel, J. andFidelius, K. (Eds.), PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, 194–238.Google Scholar
  8. George, G. S. (1980)Biomechanics of women's gymnastics. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. Hatze, H. (1981)Myocybernetic control models of skeletal muscle —characteristics and applications. Gutenberg Book Printers, Pretoria.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochmuth, G. (1974)Biomechanik sportlicher Bewegungen. Sportverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Kots, Ya. M. (1977)The organization of voluntary movement—neurophysiological mechanisms. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Medved, V. (1986) Micro-computer based measurement and processing method for human locomotor system's take-off properties evaluation. InExperimental stress analysis,Wieringa,H. (Ed.) Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 117–122. (Proceedings of the VIII Int. Conf. on Experimental Stress Analysis, Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
  13. Medved, V. (1988) Comparative analysis of bioelectrical and biomechanical properties of lower-extremity muscles in sports activities (in Serbo-Croate) Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
  14. Medved, V. andMedved, Ve. (1984) Ideal bioelectric signal analyzer concept. Proc. of the Cong. on Med. Instrum. ‘Essential qualities’, Amsterdam, 1984, A 13.Google Scholar
  15. Sage, G. H. (1973)Introduction to motor behavior: a neuropsychological approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Santambrogio, G. C. (1989) Procedure for quantitative comparison of ground reaction data.IEEE Trans.,BME-36, 247–255.Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt, R. A. (1980) Past and future issues in motor programming.Res. Quart. for Exerc. and Sport,51, 122–140.Google Scholar
  18. Shiavi, R., Bourne, J., Holland, A. (1986) Automated extraction of activity features in linear envelopes of locomotor electromyographic patterns.IEEE Trans.,BME-33, 594–600.Google Scholar
  19. Vodovnik, L. (1985)Nevrokibernetika (in Slovene) Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, Ljubljana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Medved
    • 1
  • S. Tonkovic
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical EducationUniversity of ZagrebZagrebYugoslavia
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of ZagrebZagrebYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations