Skip to main content
Log in

New epidural intracranial-pressure transducer with reduced tissue stress interference

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature pertaining to epidural-pressure measurement gives the impression that, with the use of coplanar transducers, errors due to dural bending are minimised and an epidural-pressure equivalent to the ventricular fluid pressure is obtained. By means of a simple theoretical analysis, it has been shown that, for chronic implantation measurements, coplanar systems do not have any special advantages over noncoplanar systems because both are subject to errors due to tissue compressive stresses of magnitudes considerably greater than the dural bending stresses. Therefore the considerably simpler noncoplanar transducers, together with a special approach toin vivo calibration, are adequate if they are of a form which selectively responds to c.s.f. pressure more than to tissue stresses. The conventional circular-diaphragm transducer does not satisfy the requirement. This limitation can be circumvented by reducing the deflection constraints. A new design proposed has the special feature that it responds directly to c.s.f. pressure, even though immediately over the transducer face the subarachnoid space is obliterated Model as well as animal experiments substantiate the claim. Simultaneous measurements with the new transducer and a direct c.s.f. pressure transducer show that the c.s.f. pressure changes are correctly indicated by the new transducer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Jong, D. A., Den Ouden, A. H., Van De Boon, A., Eijskoot, F. andMaas, A. (1975) Telemetered epidural pressure.Biotelemetry,2, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, S., Venegas, J. G. andBurton, J. D. (1976) The physics of the cranial cavity; hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model.Surg. Neurol.,6, 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, P. B. andRishede, J. (1972) Comparative clinical studies of epidural and ventricular pressure.InBrock, M. andDietz, H. (Eds.),Intracranial pressure, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. S. (1964) The application of physical transducers to intracavity pressure measurement with special reference to tonometry.Med. Electron. Biol. Eng.,2, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majors, R., Schettini, A., Mahig, J. andNevis, A. H. (1972) Intracranial pressures measured with the coplanar pressure transducer.Med. Biol. Eng.,10, 724–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nornes, H. andSerck-Hanssen, F. (1970) Miniature transducer for intracranial pressure monitoring in man.Arch. Neurol. Scand.,46, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roark, R. J. (1965)Formulas for stress and strain McGraw-Hill, Tokyo, 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbarg, G. andNornes, H. (1972) Simultaneous recording of epidural and ventricular fluid pressure.InBrock, M. andDietz, H. (Eds.),Intracranial pressure, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guha, S.K., Anand, S. & Tandon, P.N. New epidural intracranial-pressure transducer with reduced tissue stress interference. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 17, 757–762 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441558

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441558

Keywords

Navigation