Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Mitigating negative water quality and quality externalities by joint mangement of adjacent aquifers

  • Naomi Zeitouni
  • Ariel Dinar
Original Papers

Abstract

Groundwater basins are usually separated into aquifers that are hydrologically interrelated. This interrelation may take the form of water movement from one aquifer to another. When differentials in water quality exist, pumping from one of the aquifers can cause water movement that may be associated with degradation of its quality. A management policy that considers this interrelation may be preferable to an independent management of each aquifer. This paper develops a dynamic optimal control model to evaluate joint versus independent management. The optimal joint pumping management, in which two adjacent aquifers of different water qualities are interrelated, is analyzed and compared to independent aquifer pumping, and the situations where joint management is not required are identified. Policy implications are then derived and discussed. Finally, the theoretical model is applied to a case of interrelated aquifers in southern Israel. The empirical model identifies conditions (interest rate, agricultural fresh water supply rainfall recharge, price of surface water, drinking water quality standards) under which a joint policy is preferable. The empirical results confirm the theoretical ones.

Key words

groundwater management groundwater quality interrelated aquifers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billing, R. B. and D. L. Agthe (1980), ‘Price Elasticities for Water: A Case of Increasing Block Rates’,Land Economics 56(1), 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burt, O. R. (1976), ‘Ground and Surface Water Management for Irrigation’, in R. M. Threll, ed.,Economic Modeling for Water Policy Evaluation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Dandy, G. and P. Crawley (1984), ‘Optimal Operation of a Multiple Reservoir System Including Salinity Effects’,Water Resources Research 28(4), 979–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Water Resources (1985),Statewide Planning Program Central Valley Water Management Memorandum Report, State of California.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Water Resources (1991),California Continuing Drout 1987–1991, State of California.Google Scholar
  6. Feinerman, E. and K. C. Knapp (1983), ‘Benefits from Groundwater Management: Magnitude, Sensitivity, and Distribution’,American Journal of Agriculture Economics 65(4), 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foster, H. S. Jr. and B. R. Beattie (1979), ‘Urban Residential Demand for Water in the United States’,Land Economics 55(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glueckstern, P. (1991), ‘Cost Estimates of Large ro Systems’,Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Desalinization and Water Reuse, Malta, April 15–19.Google Scholar
  9. Nieswiadomy, M. L. (1992), ‘Estimating Urban Residential Water Demand: Effects of Price Structure, Conservation, and Education’,Water Resources Research 28(3), 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Quinn, Nigel W. T. (1991), ‘Ground Water Pumping for Water Table Management and Drainage Control in Western San Joaquin Valley’, in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, eds.,The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage Control in Agriculture. Boston MA: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Saleth, R. Maria (1991), ‘Measuring Sustainability in a Regional and Resource Context: The Case of a Groundwater Aquifer System’,Indirah Gandhi Institute of development Research Discussion Paper No. 46.Google Scholar
  12. State of Isreal Comptroller (1991),Annual Report 41.Google Scholar
  13. Swallow, S. K. (1990), ‘Depletion of the Environmental Basis for Renewable Resources: The Economics of Interdependent Renewable and Nonrenewable Resources’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tsur, Y., P. Hokyoun, and A. Issar (1989), ‘Fossil Groundwater as a Basis for Arid Zone Development’,Water Resources Development 5(3), 191–200.Google Scholar
  15. Vaux, H. J. Jr. and R. E. Howitt (1984), ‘Managing Water Scarcity: An Evaluation of Interregional Transfers’,Water Resources Research, July.Google Scholar
  16. Yaron, D., A. Dinar, H. Voet, and A. Ratner (1982),Economic Evaluation of the Rate of Substitution Between Quantity and Quality (Salinity) of Water in Irrigation, The Center for Agricultural Economic Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100 Israel, Working Paper No. 8211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi Zeitouni
    • 1
  • Ariel Dinar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Agriculture and Natural Resources DepartmentThe World BankWashington D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations