Skip to main content
Log in

Cell lineage in fracture healing in chimeric bone grafts

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous studies have shown that differences in nuclear morphology are generally sufficient to determine the species origin of cells in interspecific grafts between the Japanese quail and domestic chicken. Most quail nuclei possess 1–3 large nucleolus-associated masses of heterochromatin. Chick cells, on the other hand, usually present a more diffuse, stippled distribution of nuclear heterochromatin.

Quail embryonic limb rudiments, some with and some without established marrow cavities, were explanted and grown on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick. Three to five days post-grafting, the explants were surgically fractured and allowed to heal. Tissues were collected and histologically processed during the latter period.

The fractures healed completely within 5–6 days and no callus was established in the process. The nuclear staining pattern of the osteoblasts and osteocytes throughout the rudiments and at the fracture site indicated that they were derived from the graft. Possible sources for these cells included the periosteum, endosteum, and posthypertrophy chondrocytes. By contrast, most of the nuclei in the osteoclasts were chick-like and were apparently derived from cells originating in the host. Because the quail-like heterochromatin marker was normally present in a small number (2.5%) of chick osteoclast nuclei and was lacking in about 5% of native quail osteoclast nuclei, the precise extent of the participation of donor, i.e., quail bone and marrow stromal cells in osteoclast formation, could not be determined. However, the data suggest that in large measure the precursor cells for most osteoclasts were hematogenously derived and were carried to the grafted rudiments by the blood vascular system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tonna, E.A., Cronkite, E.P.: Cellular response to fracture studied with tritiated thymidine, J. Bone Joint Surg.43A:352–362, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hall, B.K., Jacobson, H.N.: The repair of fractured membrane bones in newly hatched chicks, Anat. Rec.181:55–70, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kernek, C.B., Wray, J.B.: Cellular proliferation in the formation of fracture callus in the rat tibia, Clin. Orthop.91:197–209, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketenjian, A.U., Arsenis, C.: Morphological and biochemical studies during differentiation and calcification of fracture callus cartilage, Clin. Orthop.197:266–273, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhlman, R.E., McNamee, M.J.: The biochemical importance of the hypertrophic cartilage cell area to endochondral bone formation, J. Bone Joint Surg.52A:1025–1032, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  6. Göthlin, G., Ericsson, J.L.E.: Observations on the mode of uptake of thorium dioxide particles by osteoclasts in fracture callus, Calcif. Tissue Res.10:216–227, 1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischman, D.A., Hay, E.D.: Origin of osteoclasts from mononuclear leucocytes in regenerating newt limbs. Anat. Rec.143:329–334, 1962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buring, K.: The origin of cells in heterotopic bone formation, Clin. Orthop.110:293–302, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn, A.J., Simmons, D.J.: Investigation of cell lineage in bone using a chimera of chick and quail embryonic tissue, Nature258:325–327, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Douarin, N.: A biological cell labeling technique and its use in experimental embryology, Dev. Biol.30:217–222, 1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jotereau, F.V., Le Douarin, N.M.: The developmental relationship between osteocytes and osteoclasts. A study using the quail-chick nuclear marker in endochondral ossification, Dev. Biol.63:253–265, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patt, H.M., Maloney, M.A.: Bone marrow regeneration after local injury: a review, Exp. Hematol.3:135–146, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holtrop, M.: The origin of bone cells in endochondral ossification. In H. Fleisch (ed.): Calcified Tissues, pp. 32–35, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shimomura, U., Wezeman, F.H., Ray, R.D.: The growth cartilage plate of the rat rib: cellular differentiation, Clin. Orthop.90:246–254, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crelin, E.S., Koch, W.E.: An autoradiographic study of chondrocyte transformation into chondroclasts and osteocytes during bone formationin vitro, Anat. Rec.158:473–484, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn, A.J., Simmons, D.J.: Chondrocyte-to-osteocyte transformation in grafts of perichondrium-free epiphyseal cartilage, Clin. Orthop.129:299–304, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamburger, V. Hamilton, H.L.: A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo, J. Morphol.88:49–67, 1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bucher, O.: Untersuchunger uber die Regenerationsvorgange an Experimentell Gesetzten Knochenbruchen in der Kultur in Vitro, Acta Anat. (Basel)14:98–107, 1952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krull, G.: Untersuchungen uber Frakturheilung in der Gewebekultur, Arch. Orthop. Unfallchir.37:131–137, 1936

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad, G.C., Reynolds, J.J.: Effect of environmental factors on the repair of bonein vitro, J. Bone Joint Surg.50B:401–408, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niven, J.S.F.: The repairin vitro of embryonic skeletal rudiments after experimental injury, J. Pathol. Bacteriol.134:307–324, 1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sevastikoglou, J.A.: Morphological studies of fracture healing in tissue culture, Acta Orthop. Scand.32:199–209, 1962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amsell, S., Dell, E.S.: Bone formation by hemopoietic tissue. Separation of preosteoblasts from hemopoietic stem cell function in the rat, Blood39:267–273, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knospe, W.H., Gregory, S.A., Husseni, S.G., Fried, W., Trobaugh, F.E., Jr.: Origin and recovery of colony-forming units in locally curetted bone marrow of mice, Blood30:331–340, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  25. Friedenstein, A.J.: Determined and inducible osteogenic precursor cells. Hard tissue growth and repair, Ciba Found. Symp.11:169–185, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  26. Friedenstein, A.J., Chailakhjan, R.K., Lalykina, K.S.: The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea pig bone marrow and spleen cells, Cell Tissue Kinet.3:393–403, 1970

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedenstein, A.J., Piatetzky-Shapiro, I.I., Petrakova, K.V.: Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.16:381–390, 1966

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, D.J., Kahn, A.J. Cell lineage in fracture healing in chimeric bone grafts. Calcif Tissue Int 27, 247–253 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441193

Key words

Navigation