Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 115–125 | Cite as

A case information management system for clinical trials

  • A. A. Buerger
  • G. C. Brady
  • I. Ausley
  • A. dePeyster
Article

Abstract

We have devised and implemented a computer-based case information management system which allows the storage, maintenance and analysis of data from any clinical trial. Before the clinical trial begins, the medical and paramedical staff devise and structure a list ot questions which are answerable by (a) a series of up to 10 multiple choices; (b) a date; (c) a number; (d) a phrase or brief sentence. These questions are allotted to forms designed to make the collection of data as efficient as possible; for example, much of a patient's history can be collected by a form which the patient fills out himself. The system is sufficiently simple so that, after a few hours' training, inexperienced students are able to enter all data into the computer. The analysis programs allow one to cross-correlate data from the first three types of questions automatically, and to obtain printouts of histograms and scattergrams correlating the appropriate types of data. These features make this approach cost effective because relatively little time of the medical and paramedical staff is required to organise and implement a clinical trial and because data entry can be performed by previously untrained personnel.

Keywords

Clinical trials Computers Statistical analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armentrout, J. A. andRouzer, D. L. (1970) Utility of the mini-mult with delinquents.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, P. (1975)Sequential medical trials, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Blessum, W. T. andSippl, C. J. (1972)Computer glossary for medical and health sciences, Funk & Wagnalls, New York, 81–82.Google Scholar
  4. Burr, P. H., Brady, G. C. andBuerger, A. A. (1976) A computer-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation unit.Heart & Lung 3, 581–593.Google Scholar
  5. Cochrane, A. L. (1975)Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
  6. Cochrane, W. G. (1952) TheX 2 test of goodness of fit.Ann. Math. Statist. 23, 315–345.Google Scholar
  7. Cochrane, W. G. (1954) Some methods for strengthening the commonX 2 tests.Biometrics 10, 417–451.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornfield, J. (1975) Design of clinical trials. InThe research status of spinal manipulative therapy (Ed. Murray Goldstein), NINCDS Monograph 15, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76-998, US Dept. Health, Education, Welfare, 303–306.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S. andDahlstrom, L. E. (1972)An MMPI Handbook, Vol. I: Clinical interpretation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, W. J. (1975)BMDP, Biomedical computer programs, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  11. Gabriel, E. R. (1970)Computerization of medical records, Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Greenes, R. A., Pappalardo, A. N., Marble, C. W. andBarnett, C. O. (1969) Design and implementation of a clinical data management system.Comput. Biomed. Res. 2, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanvick, L. J. (1951) MMPI profiles in patients with low-back pain.J. Consult. Psychol. 15, 350–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hathaway, S. R. andBriggs, P. F. (1957) Some normative data on new MMPI scales.J. Clin. Psychol. 13, 364–368.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, A. B. (1962)Statistical methods in clinical and preventive medicine, E & S Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  16. Hult, L. (1956) The Munkfors Investigation: A study of the frequency and causes of stiff neck-brachialgia and lumbago-sciatica syndrome, as well as observations on certain signs and symptoms from the dorsal spine and the joints of the extremities in industrial and forest workers.Acta. Orthop. Scan. 16, 1–76.Google Scholar
  17. Kincannon, J. C. (1968) Prediction of the standard MMPI scale scores from 71 items: the mini-mult.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 32, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ludwig, H. R. (1974) Applications of a generalized data-management language in medicine: some recent experience at Stanford University.Experentia 27, 745–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meadow, C. T. (1967)The analysis of information systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. andBent, D. H. (1975)SPSS statistical package for the social sciences, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  21. Seigel, S. (1956)Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Shires, D. B. (1974)Computer technology in the health services, Charles, C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  23. Stacy, R. W. andWaxman, B. D. (1976)Computers in biomedical research, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Steel, R. G. D. andTorrie, J. H. (1960)Principles and procedures of statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Wiltse, L. L. (1975) Psychological testing in predicting the success of low-back surgery.Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 6, 317–318.Google Scholar
  26. Yates, F. (1934) Contingency tables involving small numbers and the chi squared test.J. R. Statist. Soc. 1, 217–235.MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman, J. (1976) History of MUMPS and the MUMPS user's group. InThe changing health care team (Eds. S. Zoog and S. Yarnell), Medical Communications and Services Association, Seattle, 135–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Buerger
    • 1
  • G. C. Brady
    • 1
  • I. Ausley
    • 1
  • A. dePeyster
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Physiology, California College of MedicineUniversity of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations