, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 220–238 | Cite as

Interpersonal perceptions within AGPA's annual institute groups

  • John R. Hurley
  • Mark Rosenthal


Mental Health Professional Group Rating Maximum Data Interpersonal Style Interpersonal Competence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyris, C. C.Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey, 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Bebout, J., & Gordon, B. The value of encounter. In L. N. Solomon & B. Berzon (Eds.),New perspectives on encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Berne, E.Principles of group treatment. New York: Oxford Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Bolman, L. G. Some effects of trainers on their T-groups.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971,7, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955,52, 281–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donovan, D. M., & O'Leary, M. R. Relationship between distortions in self-perceptions of depression.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976,32, 16–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fromm, E.The art of loving. New York: Harper & Row, 1956.Google Scholar
  8. Hurley, J. R. The neglected effects of trainers on T-groups.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971,7, 647–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurley, J. R. Helpful behaviors in groups of mental health professionals and undergraduates.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1976,26, 173–189. (a)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurley, J. R.Only two major interpersonal dimensions relevant to psychotherapy? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Group Psychotherapy Association, Boston, February 1976. (b)Google Scholar
  11. Hurley, J. R. Two prepotent interpersonal dimensions and the effects of trainers on T-groups.Small Group Behavior, 1976,7, 77–98. (c)Google Scholar
  12. Hurley, J. R. Toward seeing ourselves as others see us. In L. R. Wolberg M. L. Aronson (Eds.),Group Therapy 1978. New York: Stratton, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Hurley, J. R., & Force, E. J. T-group gains in acceptance-rejection of self and others,International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1973,23, 166–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurley, J. R., & Rosenthal, M. Interpersonal rating shifts during and after AGPA's Institute groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1978,28, 115–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M.Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Maliver, B. L.The encounter game. New York: Stein & Day, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. McGreevey, J. C. Interlevel disparity and predictive efficiency.Journal of Projective Techniques, 1962,26, 80–87.Google Scholar
  18. Rogers, C. R.Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1951.Google Scholar
  19. Schriesheim, C., & Kerr, S. Psychometric qualities of the Ohio State leadership scales.Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81, 756–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Small, D. J., & Hurley, J. R. Work effectiveness and personality attributes of mental health paraprofessionals. In K. M. Nash, N. Lifton, & S. Smith (Eds.),The paraprofessional: Selected readings. New Haven: Advocate Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. Sullivan, H. S.The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. (H. S. Perry & M. L. Gawel, Eds.). New York: Norton, 1953.Google Scholar
  22. Weigel, R. G., Dinges, N., Dyer, R., & Straumfjord, A. A. Perceived self-disclosure, mental health, and who is liked in group treatment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972, 19, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yalom, I. D., & Lieberman, M. A. A study of encounter group casulaties.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971,25, 16–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Hurley
    • 1
  • Mark Rosenthal
  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations