Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anything less is not feminism: Racial difference and the W.M.W.M.

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feminism is the political theory and practice to free all women: women of colour, working class women, poor women, physically challenged women, lesbians, old women as well as white heterosexual, economically privileged women. Anything less is not feminism, but merely female self-aggrandisement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Smith,All the women are white, all the men are black B-uput some of us are brave (New York: Women of Colour Press, 1985), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In reflecting social attitudes we separate ourselves from the object and hold a mirror to it; in incorporating them, we weave them into our own subjectivity.

  3. Patriarchy is a problematic term within even ethnocentric feminism. It is even more so when it is used without recognition of the problem of race. “The notion of patriarchy is most obtuse when it disregards the position that white women occupy over black men as well as black women” — M. Simons, “Racism and Feminism”,Feminist Review 5 (1979), 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”,7 Signs (1982), 515–544.

  5. A. Davis,Women Race and Class (London: The Women's Press, 1981), 173. W.E. DuBois opens his vital literary text onThe Lives of Coloured Folk with the words “1892 was a good year for black people, only 1600 men were lynched”.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black feminists have argued that the black women is never fully “black” because depictions of the black community are invariably male-focused, and never fully “women” because depictions of the female community are invariably white-focused. In this context, the black woman as “depreciated sex object” cannot be truly a victim of rape as she is not fully a woman. See for example G. Hullet al., supra, n.1. It should be noted that the tendency they criticise is equally evident in UK discussions of racial politics.

  7. S. Hall,Policing the Crisis (London: Macmillan, 1978); J. Solomoset al, “The organic crisis of British Capitalism and race: the experience of the seventies”, in S. Hallet al (eds.),The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in Seventies Britain (London: Hutchinson, 1982), 38–52; P. Gilroy, “Stepping out of Babylon — race, class, and autonomy”,ibid, in S. Hallet al (eds.),The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in Seventies Britain (London: Hutchinson, 1982), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bourne, “Towards an anti-racist feminism”,Race and Class 25 (1983), 1–22, at 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Friedan,The Feminine Mystique, (New York: Norton, 1963), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Hooks,Feminist Theory: from margin to centre (Boston, Mass.: South End Press, 1984), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For analysis of the racism and ethnocentricity implicit in some of the leading texts of contemporary feminism see, for example, M. Simons, “Racism and Feminism”,supra n.3. n. 3; A. Davis,Women Race and Class, supra n.5; B. Hooks,Talking Back, Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black (London: Sheba, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Fritz,Dreamers and Dealers (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979), 51, as cited by B. Hooks,Feminist Theory: from Margin to Center, supra n. 10, at 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Hooks,ibid., 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Barrett,Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis (London: Verso 1980, 2nd ed. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. The examples in this section are drawn largely from British society, although the same questions arise in the context of the United States.

  16. H. Afshar, “Introduction”, in H. Afshar, ed.,Women, State and Ideology (London: MacMillan, 1987), 1–9 at 4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Carby, “White woman listen! Black feminism and the boundaries of sisterhood”, in Hallet al., supra; n. 7, at 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Barrett and M. McIntosh,The Anti-social Family (London: Verso, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Wilson,Finding A Voice: Asian Women in Britain (London: Virago, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.-K. Bhavnani and M. Coulson, “Transforming Socialist Feminism: The Challenge of Racism”,Feminist Review 23 (1986), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Wilson, “Maxism and the Welfare State”,New Left Review 122 (1980), 15–20; M. Barrett and M. McIntosh,supra n.18. M. Barrett and M. McIntosh,The Anti-social Family (London: Verso, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Trivedi, “To Deny our Fullness: Asian Women in the Making of History”,Feminist Review 17 (1984), 37–50 at 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Bryanet al., The Heart of the Race: Black Women's Lives in Britain (London: Virago, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Thompson,Britain Under Siege (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Bryanet al., n.23supra. at 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See A. Davis,supra, n.5 at ch.12, “Racism, Brith Control, and Reproductive Rights”.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Lorde,Sister Outsider (London: Virago, 1984), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  28. “Arab Women and Western Feminism: An Interview with Nawal E1 Sadaawi”,Race and Class 22 (1980), 175–182 at 177, as cited by Bourne,supra n.8, at 285 J. Bourne, “Towards an anti-racist feminism”,Race and Class 25 (1983), 1–22 at 285.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

White Middle-class Women's Movement.

My special thanks to Susie Gibson for her insight and support on this project. Thanks to Akua Rugg for being there.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, C. Anything less is not feminism: Racial difference and the W.M.W.M.. Law Critique 1, 237–248 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439615

Keywords

Navigation