Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental assessment of wind erosion after soil stabilization treatments at Eneabba, Western Australia

  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind tunnel experiments on rehabilitation surfaces at Eneabba, Western Australia evaluated the techniques used by Associated Minerals Consolidated Ltd. (AMC) and Allied Eneabba Ltd. (AEL) to stabilize regions being revegetated following heavy mineral sand mining.

Newly landscaped areas proved to be the most erodible, beginning to erode at 9 m sec−1 and producing a soil flux of 10 kg m−1 min−1 at 18 m sec−1 wind speeds. Sandier, more organically-rich, surfaces in the rehabilitation areas were somewhat less erodible with losses of only 2 kg m−1 min−1 at wind speeds of 18 m sec−1.

The mining companies use various nurse crops and top dressing mulch for surface stabilization. Rows of oats, sparse plantings of the grass cultivar “SUDAX” (Dekalb ST6) supplied by Westfarmers Ltd. and applications of Terolas, a cold, bituminous surface binding material supplied by Shell Co. of Australia Ltd., all proved successful in reducing wind erosion in this semi-arid region where more than 25% of summer days experience winds greater than 8 m sec−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouyoucos, B.J. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method.Soil Sci. 42, 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D.J. 1985. Preventing wind erosion.West. Aust. Dep. Agric. Farmnote No. 36, 2 pp.

  • Chepil, W.S., Siddoway, F.H., & Armburst, D.V. 1962. Climatic factor for estimating wind erodibility of farm fields.J. Soil Water Conserv. 17, 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepil, W.S. & Woodruff, N.P. 1963. The physics of wind crosion and its control.Adv. Agron. 15, 211–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, L., 1983. Erosive wind energy distributions and climatic factors for the West.J. Soil Water Conserv. 38, 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, L. & Allison, B.E., 1980. Range grasses and their small grain equivalents for wind crosion control.J. Range Mgmt. 33, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981. Equivalent wind erosion protection from selected crop residues.Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engin. 24, 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, E.M. 1983. The influence of wind speed and direction on the reduction of wind speed leeward of a medium porous hedge.Agric. Meterorol. 30, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, E.L. 1983. Wind erosion calculation: Revision of residual table.J. Soil Water Conserv. 38, 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier, W.H. & Mannering, J.V. 1970 Relation of soil properties to its erodibility.Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 33, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, N.P. & Siddoway, F.H., 1965. A wind erosion equationSoil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 29, 602–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, N.P. & Armbrust, D.V. 1968. A montly climatic factor for the wind erosion equation.J. Soil Water Conserv. 23, 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingg, A.W. 1951. A portable wind tunnel and dust collector developed to evaluate the erodibility of field surfaces.Agron. J. 43, 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingg, A.W., Woodruff, N.P. & Engleton, C.I., 1952. Effect of wind-row orientation on crodibility of land in sorghum stubble.Agron. J. 44, 227–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, D.T., Carter, D.J. & Hetherington, R.E. Experimental assessment of wind erosion after soil stabilization treatments at Eneabba, Western Australia. Environ Geochem Health 8, 99–104 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439211

Keywords

Navigation